Started By
Message
So #2 looks weak beating #25, but #3 lost to #19?
Posted on 10/30/14 at 11:45 pm
Posted on 10/30/14 at 11:45 pm
maybe the SEC bias is real? 
10
Posted on 10/30/14 at 11:51 pm to Dlab2013
Ummm...what?
#19 also only lost to #1 and #3.
#19 also only lost to #1 and #3.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 11:53 pm to Dlab2013
There is quite a difference in winning by 11 and losing, no?
Posted on 10/30/14 at 11:55 pm to GeauxWarTigers
Posted by Message
GeauxWarTigers
So #2 looks weak beating #25, but #3 lost to #19?
Ummm...what?
#19 also only lost to #1 and #3.
Good point. Think about that
Posted on 10/31/14 at 12:19 am to Dlab2013
quote:
So #2 looks weak beating #25, but #3 lost to #19?
#3 lost to #1.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 12:23 am to GeauxWarTigers
quote:
Ummm...what? #19 also only lost to #1 and #3.
#19 looked like they didn't even belong on the same field as #1 and #3 for 7/8 quarters.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 12:34 am to Dlab2013
#25 isn't gonna be ranked next poll... LSU also has more NFL talent than the Lou. Aside from that, identical.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 12:43 am to Dlab2013
What the frick am I reading right now?
Posted on 10/31/14 at 1:30 am to lsusportsman2
quote:
What the frick am I reading right now?
The clusterfrick that occurs when you use rankings from different polls and different weeks to make an argument instead of team names. Then you don't even make an argument and expect the numbers (which you poorly selected) to make the argument for you.
#3 would be Ole Miss. They lost to #19 who is LSU. The problem here is that Ole Miss isn't #3. They are #4. They were #3 when they lost to LSU, but LSU wasn't #19, they were #24. These rankings also come from different polls (#4/#19 are this weeks Playoff Rankings while the #3/#24 are from the AP). So last weeks AP#3 lost to this weeks Playoff#19.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:02 am to N97883
#4 > #19 > 10-7
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:04 am to GeauxWarTigers
These LSU fams makes me laugh. Yes you beat Ole Miss at home by only 3. Now Ole Miss lead most of the whole game but you would thought LSU just beat Ole Miss 41-7...
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:11 am to GatorReb
10-7 > temporary moral victory
Posted on 10/31/14 at 2:20 am to Dlab2013
If Winston wasn't hurt FSU probably rolls Louisvilles #1 defense by 21+
FSU is getting better as the year goes on.. they have some OL issues but Winston is a gamer
FSU is getting better as the year goes on.. they have some OL issues but Winston is a gamer
This post was edited on 10/31/14 at 2:21 am
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:11 am to Dlab2013
tDecline was false hope, for some.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 4:09 am to Dlab2013
FSU is a fricking joke. They have played nobody, and the only reason they are ranked high is that they played the worst SEC champion in 10+ years last year and barely won.
This post was edited on 10/31/14 at 4:11 am
Posted on 10/31/14 at 4:15 am to TonySnow1
quote:
hese LSU fams makes me laugh. Yes you beat Ole Miss at home by only 3. Now Ole Miss lead most of the whole game but you would thought LSU just beat Ole Miss 41-7...
Ole Miss had to get 10 different kinds of lucky to keep it that close. I love how LSU loses to Miss. St. by 5, but everyone calls it a blowout because the score didn't reflect the game, but LSU dominates Ole Miss and a million breaks for the Rebs make it close and Ole Miss fans act like it wasn't a dominant win.
Posted on 10/31/14 at 4:51 am to Nuts4LSU
Ole Miss did not have to get 10 kinds of luck, that game was just a hard battle for both teams. The game is won by the score board not because another teams has better stats. If LSU had ran for 500 yards and lost the game, would you say those 500 yards was worthless...
Posted on 10/31/14 at 5:05 am to Dlab2013
quote:
but #3 lost to #19?
7-41 ?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News