Started By
Message
re: "SEC Dynasties"
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:30 am to GeorgeReymond
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:30 am to GeorgeReymond
You forgot LSU women's track. Like 12 straight National Titles from the 80's to the 90's.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:55 am to GeorgeReymond
This is a cool thread. Here's what I've got for Georgia:
Women's Gymnastics (1987-2009)
10 NC's, including 5 in a row from 2005-2009
Men's Tennis (1999-2008)
5 NC's (there were also 2 NC's in 1985 and 1987)
Women's Swimming and Diving (1999-Present)
6 NC's
Aw, Hell... Equestrian too (2003-2010)
5 NC's
Women's Gymnastics (1987-2009)
10 NC's, including 5 in a row from 2005-2009
Men's Tennis (1999-2008)
5 NC's (there were also 2 NC's in 1985 and 1987)
Women's Swimming and Diving (1999-Present)
6 NC's
Aw, Hell... Equestrian too (2003-2010)
5 NC's
Posted on 10/30/14 at 12:58 am to RollTide1987
quote:
3 national championships, not 2. We were national champs in 61, 64 and 65.
Yea, those were good teams. One of them even finished with a better record then Arkansas.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 1:08 am to BallstotheWesleyWall
Olw Miss was far better than Syracuse in 1959, they got screwed because of the Northern bias in the AP voting.
Just compare the records, Syracuse played a crap schedule and barely squeaked by in a few of the games.
Just compare the records, Syracuse played a crap schedule and barely squeaked by in a few of the games.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 2:33 am to GeorgeReymond
Between 1902 and 1912, Vandy football went 86-13-6 and won 9 Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association Championships
Bow. Bow hard.
Also, between 2002 and 2013, Vandy won 10 Quidditch national titles.*
*Unverified, based on probability statistics
Bow. Bow hard.
Also, between 2002 and 2013, Vandy won 10 Quidditch national titles.*
*Unverified, based on probability statistics
Posted on 10/30/14 at 5:41 am to randomways
LSU Women's Track (1987-2008) 25 national championships including indoor/outdoor
Posted on 10/30/14 at 6:54 am to GeorgeReymond
quote:
LSU
Baseball (1991-2000) 5 CWS Titles
But in 2000 you didn't even win your own conference
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:23 am to GeorgeReymond
quote:
Basically everything except T&F, only because LSU & Arkansas literally have 30-40 national championships.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:34 am to BallstotheWesleyWall
quote:
Out scoring opponents 350-21 in a 10-0-1 campaign and being rated by Sagarin as the third best team from 1956-95 is pretty real to me.
10-0-1 with a 1960 Sugar Bowl victory and wins at Tennessee and Arkansas is pretty real as well.
10-0 in 1962 with wins at No. 4 LSU and vs No. 6 Arkansas also counts as a legitimate national title.
It's no secret why we didn't win the AP Poll.
And people talk about our unwarranted national title claims.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:38 am to GeorgeReymond
UK men's basketball 1995-1998. Final four every year, two national titles and a runner up (in overtime) finish. Also included the 1996 team that won their tournament games by the highest margin ever (I'm too lazy to look it up but it's an absurd margin).
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:39 am to GeorgeReymond
Alabama and Georgia can probably claim some level of dynasties in Gymnastics - especially Georgia.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:43 am to BallstotheWesleyWall
Just stop. Ole Miss never had a dynasty in football.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:48 am to GeorgeReymond
LSU had a split title, and 2 loses on the other during that time frame. Not really killing it there.
This post was edited on 10/30/14 at 7:51 am
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:58 am to GeorgeReymond
quote:
everything except T&F
in that case, UGA gymnastics won 5 consecutive national titles between roughly 2004-2008ish.
I guess the only thing you could maybe say as one for football, although it would not qualify if we're saying you have to have 2 titles at least, would be 80-83.
In that 4 year period we won 3 consecutive SEC titles, played for 2 national titles winning 1, and only lost 1 SEC game in 4 years. 43-4-1 record during that time.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:06 am to AUCE05
I don't think LSU's national championship in 2003 is diminished because of the AP vote. For me, there is no such thing as a split in the BCS era - the BCS title is the title.
That being said, I agree that two titles from 2003-2007 is not a dynasty. You have to at least be in contention for the title in those in between years where you don't win it.
I have great respect for LSU, and in my mind they have taken Tennessee's seat as second in the conference since 2000. But I can't call 2003-2007 a dynasty.
That being said, I agree that two titles from 2003-2007 is not a dynasty. You have to at least be in contention for the title in those in between years where you don't win it.
I have great respect for LSU, and in my mind they have taken Tennessee's seat as second in the conference since 2000. But I can't call 2003-2007 a dynasty.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News