Started By
Message
3
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:39 pm to LegendOfCobb
The only real football team in Kentucky is playing one ESPN right now
Clue #1 They wear red, not blue!
Clue #1 They wear red, not blue!
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:41 pm to LegendOfCobb
quote:
I like the Kentucky Headhunters? Not good smack.
Ale 8 and SlawDogs for the MFW!!
BTW, pretty sure if you are a Creeker and know the WF to WF crowd your 90% prediction probably goes to 99% especially if you are in the 02
Who you liking for council BTW?
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:44 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
EC championships are like 5 Championships in any other conference
Bull shite. Maybe recently but not historically.
quote:
Basically Missouri and Kentucky have 2, that would prove my point
No, you are not entitled to your own facts Grits.
quote:
As to bowls that might mean something
You are such a tool. quote:
MU 4-5, respectable, but not being in SEC means easier to get in good bowls
Just fricking stop man.
quote:
MU .547 and 650 wins
UK .496 and 586 wins
Granted MU has added wins and a slightly better all time percentage but that is more than balanced by the arse pounding UK suffered as a member of the SEC as a charter member. Again, neither is impressive and both are about dead center on the standard bell curve, yet again proving my point.
No. You are an idiot. Thats the only thing you "proved"
The SEC is strong now. Hasnt always been head and shoulders above other conferences.
quote:
finally playing in a real football conference and not lots and lots of pussy wins
Oh my. What a douche. "pussy wins"?
Kentucky sucks historically and is not even close to Mizzou's program which is average.
Them the facts. No spin.
What years did Kentucky win the SEC East again? I forget sometimes.
This post was edited on 10/30/14 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:50 pm to kilo
Mizzou was in a god awful conference for nearly their entire existence. That's also a fact.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:51 pm to kilo
quote:
Kentucky sucks historically and is not even close to Mizzou's program which is average.
They are both close to .500 man, that is neither bad nor good, that is pretty much the definition of average. Keep telling yourself Tigers are better but when the final score is Missouri or Kentucky by a TD.
Calling me names does not make Mizzou better but I guess you need it to get you through your average existence.
Really man, using 13 conference championships up to WWII
Dores had that many before 1933, congrats on being as good as Vanderbilt in football.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:53 pm to thesoccerfanjax
quote:
Mizzou was in a god awful conference for nearly their entire existence. That's also a fact.
Yea, them yankees will never come into the SEC from that sub par non football conference and have success let alone win the East....
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:55 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
They are both close to .500 man, that is neither bad nor good, that is pretty much the definition of average. Keep telling yourself Tigers are better but when the final score is Missouri or Kentucky by a TD.
You brought it up Grits. YOU brought up historical aspects of the two programs.
I just, uncomfortably for you obviously, pointed out your painting of the two programs as historically "equal" was complete bullshite but simply laying out the facts.
How you feel you want or need to spin shite after the fact is on you. The facts are here in the open for folks to make their own judgments.
This post was edited on 10/30/14 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:58 pm to kilo
In the worst year in 25 years? Sure. Congrats. Enjoy it because it will never happen again.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 7:58 pm to thesoccerfanjax
Asking for a friend, what's the biggest lead Petrino ever blew at Arkansas
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:00 pm to kilo
How has this one not made an appearance yet?
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:00 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
Calling me names does not make Mizzou better but I guess you need it to get you through your average existence.
Here comes the "poor me" section of your normal nonsense. You started the crap, again. I just clarified your spin on historical aspects and you went into full "douche" mode with your shitty nonsense laced diatribe trying to spin the simple facts.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:01 pm to undecided
A lot versus Kentucky. The 7 overtime game. I think that was petrino.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:01 pm to kilo
have an upvote
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:11 pm to Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:14 pm to thesoccerfanjax
quote:
In the worst year in 25 years?
Nope.
quote:
2010 SEC East and its one ranked team, #22, winning the division says "hello"
Dont let that stop this bull shite narrative. East had #4,#5 and #24 ranked teams.
Lets look at the facts:
SEC East ranked teams per year:
1992: 8,10,12
1993: 5,12
1994: 7,22
1995: 2,3
1996: 1,9
1997: 4,10,7
1998: 1,5,14
1999: 12,9,16
2000: 10,19,20
2001: 4,3,13,22
2002: 3
2003: 7,15,24
2004: 13,7
2005: 10,12
2006: 1,25,23
2007: 2,12,13
2008: 1,13
2009: 3
2010: 22
2011: 9,19
2012: 5,9,8,23
2013: 5,4,24
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:17 pm to kilo
I don't have the time or inclination to read through y'alls debate, cheese and kilo. But to cheese and others trying to hide behind UK's SEC membership as opposed to Mizzou's Big 8/12 membership over the years to defend UK having a poorer all time record, please stop. It does nothing to explain Mizzou forging a winning all-time record against all but one of the other existing SEC members during its time in the Big 8/12, including a 7-3 record *against* the SEC in bowl games.
The high horsing about the SEC throughout its history ignores what teams like OU and Nebraska did historically, the powers that teams like Texas were nationally during the Big 12 years etc. And if you argue "well sure but those leagues were top heavy" well that doesn't do anything to defend UK sorry because it doesn't disprove that perhaps the SEC was also top heavy many years. It's just a bad argument IMHO.
The numbers are what they are all the way around. UK has been far better historically in basketball, Mizzou has been better historically in football. Both sides should accept that and either that doesn't - some of our own younger, nuttier hoops fans included - is deluding themselves.
The high horsing about the SEC throughout its history ignores what teams like OU and Nebraska did historically, the powers that teams like Texas were nationally during the Big 12 years etc. And if you argue "well sure but those leagues were top heavy" well that doesn't do anything to defend UK sorry because it doesn't disprove that perhaps the SEC was also top heavy many years. It's just a bad argument IMHO.
The numbers are what they are all the way around. UK has been far better historically in basketball, Mizzou has been better historically in football. Both sides should accept that and either that doesn't - some of our own younger, nuttier hoops fans included - is deluding themselves.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:19 pm to kilo
quote:
The facts are here in the open for folks to make their own judgments
Vanderbilt = 13 championships by 1923 (14 if you count both in 22')
1897 SIAA
1901 SIAA
1903 SIAA
1904 SIAA
1905 SIAA
1906 SIAA
1907 SIAA
1910 SIAA
1911 SIAA
1912 SIAA
1915 SIAA
1922 SIAA and Southern Conference
1923 Southern Conference
Missouri = 13 championships by 1945
1893 WIUFA Co-Champions
1894 WIUFA Co-Champions
1895 WIUFA Co-Champions
1909 MVC Champions
1913 MVC Co-Champions
1919 MVC Champions
1924 MVC Champions
1925 MVC Champions
1927 MVC Champions
1939 Big 8 Champions
1941 Big 8 Champions
1942 Big 8 Champions
1945 Big 8 Champions
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:23 pm to Cheese Grits
Posted on 10/30/14 at 8:26 pm to Cheese Grits
Vanderbilt winning percentage: .498
Kentucky winning percentage: .496
You are just all over the place Grits. Are you on tilt?
You can cherry pick nonsense and build your straw men, like you always do, or you can just own the reality and the entirety of the argument.
Your choice Obi Won.
Kentucky winning percentage: .496
You are just all over the place Grits. Are you on tilt?
You can cherry pick nonsense and build your straw men, like you always do, or you can just own the reality and the entirety of the argument.
Your choice Obi Won.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News