Started By
Message
Which QB in the state is more valuable to their team?
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:27 am
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:27 am
Trying to rustle as many maroon/rebel Jimmies as can be rustled today.... so it comes down to which QB scenario would be worse for its team....
Bo Wallace going down for the season
Dak Prescott going down for the season
Bo Wallace going down for the season
Dak Prescott going down for the season
14
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:28 am to LAREBEL2013
quote:
Trying to rustle as many maroon/rebel Jimmies as can be rustled today.
it'd work a lot better if you don't lead off with this
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:29 am to LAREBEL2013
Neither will happen
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:29 am to LAREBEL2013
Honestly, as good as Prescott is, if Bo goes down OM's season is over. State has a really strong running game to fall back on.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:29 am to LAREBEL2013
Dak is.
The reason JR runs so well is because of the threat of Dak keeping it. You saw what their offense was like last year with Damien. OM has the more complete defense so they could lean on them more than state could. State may believe they can just hand the ball of the Josh and be fine, but without Dak, he isnt going anywhere.
The reason JR runs so well is because of the threat of Dak keeping it. You saw what their offense was like last year with Damien. OM has the more complete defense so they could lean on them more than state could. State may believe they can just hand the ball of the Josh and be fine, but without Dak, he isnt going anywhere.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:30 am to LAREBEL2013
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:31 am to LAREBEL2013
Without Prescott MSU wouldn't have this type of success and Bo doesn't play great at times
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:32 am to skirpnasty
& our back up laid more points on Mississippi last year than Bo laid on State...
He Won the ArKansas game.
He Won the ArKansas game.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:32 am to skirpnasty
Ole Miss wasn't good with Bo when he had a nagging injury, but he still played if that tells you how it would be without him.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:32 am to skirpnasty
quote:
Honestly, as good as Prescott is, if Bo goes down OM's season is over. State has a really strong running game to fall back on.
You really think State can continue success without Dak? I fully admit our success hinges complete on how Bo goes, but without Dak State is not #1.
This post was edited on 10/14/14 at 9:35 am
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:34 am to LAREBEL2013
They're both equally valuable. If either went down they'd put in inexperienced backups and run a whole bunch.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:34 am to LAREBEL2013
Dak is Mississippi State's entire offense. They may not realize it yet, but Dak is Mississippi State's entire offense.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:35 am to Hardy_Har
quote:
Ole Miss wasn't good with Bo when he had a nagging injury, but he still played if that tells you how it would be without him.
It tells you that a returning QB that led a team to 8 wins is better than a true freshman. We wont know for sure until next year, but I really like RB with that defense.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:35 am to Whereisomaha
Ah, yes, the "Robinson isn't actually an elite RB and is actually not as good as our 6 backs" reply...
He very well may lead the SEC in yards after contact. I'm sure this would change and he would start going down on first contact if someone different was handing him the ball...
He very well may lead the SEC in yards after contact. I'm sure this would change and he would start going down on first contact if someone different was handing him the ball...
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:36 am to LAREBEL2013
Dak and it's not close. He makes that offense go.
The strength of Ole Miss is your defense. It would hurt more to lose your best dlineman than bo
The strength of Ole Miss is your defense. It would hurt more to lose your best dlineman than bo
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:37 am to LAREBEL2013
this is becoming pathetic. MS has two good football teams. We get it.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:37 am to engie
Did you just quote something that no one even came close to saying? 
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:38 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
WhereisomahaWhich QB in the state is more valuable to their team?Did you just quote something that no one even came close to saying?
I believe he did.... what a Stark-Tard
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:38 am to StarkRebel
quote:
You really think State can continue success without Dak? I fully admit our success hinges complete on how Bo goes, but without Dak State is not #1.
We definitely wouldn't be #1. Just saying I think we would limp through the schedule. Our backups are serviceable, Williams has SEC experience.
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:40 am to engie
And FTR, I dont think Josh would be the problem. He's a top 4 back. But he would not be near as productive without the best running QB in the nation running the option with him. No one can disagree with that. People would add another defender in the box, and Josh would not be able to carry the offense. I dont think thats crazy to say.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News