Started By
Message
Nick Ruffin Hit
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:02 pm
I didn't agree with the ejection. What say you?
8
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:04 pm to Aubie Spr96
He doesn't have to sit next week does he?
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:06 pm to DuncanIdaho
it was in the first half so no.
call was b.s. he hit him with the shoulder
call was b.s. he hit him with the shoulder
This post was edited on 10/5/14 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:08 pm to Toby Flenderson
bullshite call IMHO. Hit with his shoulder pads, did not appear to go for the head. The officiating in that game was Big 12 bad.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:11 pm to Aubie Spr96
It was the right call. He hit him too high. Great hit through. The targeting rule needs to go.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:16 pm to Aubie Spr96
The flag was bullshite.
The ejection was bullshite.
He hit the guy in the upper chest with his shoulder.
The hit was violent as frick.
The hit was perfectly clean.
The end.
The ejection was bullshite.
He hit the guy in the upper chest with his shoulder.
The hit was violent as frick.
The hit was perfectly clean.
The end.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:16 pm to Aubie Spr96
Was a really vicious hit, but it was not targeting. I am not even sure it was late. My sisters kid plays D1 and had a similar call for hit he made. They overturned it after watching the replay this year.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:16 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
It was the right call. He hit him too high.
frick you.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:17 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
It was the right call. He hit him too high. Great hit through. The targeting rule needs to go.
This. Hosley even knew right away it was targeting. He's a good player just gotta watch those type hits.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:19 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
Targeting and Initiating Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player (Rule 9-1-4)
No player shall target and initiate contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, fist, elbow or shoulder. When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 2-27-14)
It was the right call but a little bullshite that it is a penalty. He should have hit a half foot lower
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:20 pm to GenesChin
Right call, ejection was good. bullshite rule, though.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:20 pm to Aubie Spr96
I need to see a gif of it to make any kind of ruling
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:23 pm to TheJones
quote:
Right call, ejection was good. bullshite rule, though.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:23 pm to Aubie Spr96
Awesome hit.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:31 pm to blzr
I thought it was a bit of a late hit on a defenseless receiver but not a targeting penalty. Should have been a 15 yard personal foul but not an ejection. Looked shoulder to shoulder to me while the receiver was coming down.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:35 pm to Toby Flenderson
He did hit him with his shoulder, but it was around the neck area. It was hard to argue with the ejection, IMO. If the shoe was on the other foot, I would have wanted the DB ejected. I don't think, for a second, it was intentional....but it was what it was.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:48 pm to MrAUTigers
Neck area is danger zone according to NCAA rule I quoted earlier. Correct call.
He is back for the grinders though
He is back for the grinders though
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:52 pm to Aubie Spr96
It was at most a late hit.
I guess part of NR hit part of the WR above the shoulder, but he did not leave his feet, he did not lead with his head, and if that results in ejection- they need to eject more players every week from every team.
I guess part of NR hit part of the WR above the shoulder, but he did not leave his feet, he did not lead with his head, and if that results in ejection- they need to eject more players every week from every team.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:55 pm to makersmark1
quote:
It was at most a late hit.
I guess part of NR hit part of the WR above the shoulder, but he did not leave his feet, he did not lead with his head, and if that results in ejection- they need to eject more players every week from every team.
This is where I'm at with it.
Posted on 10/5/14 at 8:58 pm to AUtigerNOLA
quote:
Hosley even knew right away it was targeting. He's a good player just gotta watch those type hits.
Just because he knew what the flag was for doesn't mean he agreed with it. It was a terrible call but I blame the rules more than the officials.
Page 1 of 3
Latest Auburn News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News