Michel on the sideline does not make us a better team. BUT ....

I think it's BARELY gives Gurley more of an advantage in the Heisman race. It is a pretty sizable disadvantage for Georgia competitively though.

I love Chubb, everyone loves Chubb, he's the Chubbdozer. But, IMO, Michel had separated himself with his versatility. Chubb is a battering ram as you said. He's shown decent hands too. But Michel provided a great receiving threat, it seems a better understanding of the offense, IMO better vision, and was more of a threat.

With Michel we obviously had more backs but he had his own little offensive wrinkles he provided like screens, other routes, and still could run any way you needed him. With Chubb it's like following a Mack Truck with a Bulldozer. He is a great RB but I feel like when he's in the DC has less to stress about in terms of his uses.

Granted, this is all minute things and I have ended up turning this into Michel vs Chubb so I'll wrap it all up by saying that what infinitesimal advantage Gurley has in the Heisman race is completely negated by the loss on our offense.

didnt you start this same thread last week?