Started By
Message
Good read analyzing UT's offensive concepts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 7:15 am
Posted on 9/25/14 at 7:15 am
One has to wonder how much they will stick to their favorites or if they will come out with totally new stuff. What say the GSB? Either way, it is an informative read.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 9/25/14 at 7:52 am to Spaceman Spiff
They will stick to it, just like they did last year. We might see a few deep balls, but that will be off the play action.
Was a pretty good article and breakdown.
Was a pretty good article and breakdown.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 7:58 am to Spaceman Spiff
Why do they call an end around a "jet sweep?"
It's not really a sweep at all. There are no pulling blockers.
Anyway, the key to stopping this offense is linebacker play.
It's not really a sweep at all. There are no pulling blockers.
Anyway, the key to stopping this offense is linebacker play.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 7:59 am to IT_Dawg
UT will put 40 points on Pruitt's secondary. I hope we can score 50+ this Saturday.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:02 am to Spaceman Spiff
The biggest thing holding them back as a team is that their OL is awful. Probably the worst in the league
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:11 am to Crowknowsbest
Here's a link to every UT "O" play vs OU. It's 8 min. long...
LINK
Buttload of WR screens...
UT O-line is bad, especially in run blocking...
#19 for OU was causing havoc in UT's backfield blitzing off the edge all night...
Except for 2 runs Hurd looks pedestrian at best, prolly due to O-line...
Worley missed a lotta open receievers when he had time to throw...
UT runs plays east-west too much, didn't try to stretch the field too much...
Just my casual observations...
LINK
Buttload of WR screens...
UT O-line is bad, especially in run blocking...
#19 for OU was causing havoc in UT's backfield blitzing off the edge all night...
Except for 2 runs Hurd looks pedestrian at best, prolly due to O-line...
Worley missed a lotta open receievers when he had time to throw...
UT runs plays east-west too much, didn't try to stretch the field too much...
Just my casual observations...
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:11 am to samson'sseed
A sweep doesn't have to include a pulling guard or FB.
While a lot of sweeps do, the toss sweep and flanker (jet) sweep can utilize straight zone blocking.
Sweep is the act of a slight arch running to the outside parallel to the line of scrimmage.
While a lot of sweeps do, the toss sweep and flanker (jet) sweep can utilize straight zone blocking.
Sweep is the act of a slight arch running to the outside parallel to the line of scrimmage.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 8:30 am to Lucius Clay
quote:
UT will put 40 points on Pruitt's secondary.
wanna bet?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 9:39 am to dallasga6
quote:
#19 for OU was causing havoc in UT's backfield blitzing off the edge all night...
Eric Striker is a monster. He lived in Alabama's backfield during the Sugar Bowl.
The key to this game is our pass rush. If Floyd, Jenkins and co. can hang out in the backfield, it'll be a good day for the defense. If not, the offense better be ready for a shootout.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 9:42 am
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:11 am to VADawg
quote:
Eric Striker is a monster
This
We don't have anyone that damn good at pass rushing.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:16 am to VADawg
I worry about, as the author suggested, Georgia's front being too aggressive and letting some screens/draws get through.
I'm still convinced that UT's offense victimizes the Georgia defense. Kinda looked like they moved decently vs OU. They just gave up some inopportune sacks and OU got some nice turnovers. They had 3 turnovers forced when UT as on their side of the 50 alone.
I'm still convinced that UT's offense victimizes the Georgia defense. Kinda looked like they moved decently vs OU. They just gave up some inopportune sacks and OU got some nice turnovers. They had 3 turnovers forced when UT as on their side of the 50 alone.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:26 am to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
I'm still convinced that UT's offense victimizes the Georgia defense. Kinda looked like they moved decently vs OU. They just gave up some inopportune sacks and OU got some nice turnovers. They had 3 turnovers forced when UT as on their side of the 50 alone.
While this is all true, it's pretty characteristic of young teams that are replacing their entire OL playing on the road.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:27 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Floyd can be
I have never seen Floyd look as good as striker. Floyd shows flashes at times but Striker is a damn animal.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:32 am to Crowknowsbest
The first fumble, which I think set the tone, can absolutely be attributed to that. The 2nd INT, the one in the corner of the end zone, I think was pretty much just excellent ball skills by the DB. The 3rd was a combination of bad decision making by Worley and the secondary taking advantage.
It goes without saying but the OU DBs are flat out better than Georgia's and their pass rush is as lethal if not more. Even then UT had at least some success. I'm focusing too much on the negative, and OU got the job done, but I think that game could have been closer. I just think UT is more dangerous than in the past.
It goes without saying but the OU DBs are flat out better than Georgia's and their pass rush is as lethal if not more. Even then UT had at least some success. I'm focusing too much on the negative, and OU got the job done, but I think that game could have been closer. I just think UT is more dangerous than in the past.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:34 am to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
I have never seen Floyd look as good as striker. Floyd shows flashes at times but Striker is a damn animal.
How many times have you watched him, though? Twice? Bama and UT? Have you watched a bunch of their other games?
I feel like because we watch Floyd all the time we see him at his best and worst but with Striker we see him because he's definitely a gamer. I don't watch enough OU to know if he is always on fire but I have heard from some he is undersized and sometimes struggles with the run. That's nit picky but that's like complaining about Floyd (not saying you are). I am sure there are some who have only watched UGA in big games like LSU last year or Clemson this year and thought Floyd was an animal.
Personally, I think Floyd is way better athletically but probably a good bit more raw. Right now though I am just shootin' the shite, who knows.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 10:36 am
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:38 am to Damn Good Dawg
Worley will be a Heisman contender by the time the game is over.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:49 am to Damn Good Dawg
I don't think UGA D will do as well as OU, but there's a lot of possibilities between that and getting abused.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 11:05 am to Crowknowsbest
Sure. I just lean toward abuse. Between having a bye, the talent gap between the OU and Georgia defense, and OU having a more balanced offense that, despite missing a Gurley, is IMO more potent I think we shouldn't expect doing as well as them. The secondary, it just scares me.
Guess that also means I think OU is better than Georgia, which annoys me, but oh well.
Btw, is Mauger playing this week?
Guess that also means I think OU is better than Georgia, which annoys me, but oh well.
Btw, is Mauger playing this week?
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 11:07 am
Posted on 9/25/14 at 11:28 am to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
Mauger playing this week?
Apparently he has returned to practice and may play.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 11:35 am
Latest Georgia News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News