Started By
Message

Well.... looks like you can upskirt in Texas again..

Posted on 9/20/14 at 8:55 am
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 8:55 am
quote:

A Texas court has thrown out a law prohibiting ‘up the skirt’ photography, on the grounds the previous ruling violated Texas’ citizens’ constitutional right to freedom of expression.


The Texas Court of Appeals ruled 8-1 to strike down part of a law which bans taking images of another person in public without their consent and with the intention to “arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person”, criticising the “paternalistic” intrusion into peoples’ private right to be aroused.



quote:

Halie Ricketts, a victim of an ‘up the skirt’ shot in an Austin mall earlier this year, commented: “Currently the law is protecting the criminals and not the victims”.

The individual, who Ms Ricketts claims stuck a camera up her skirt and took a photograph, has not been charged.

The judges’ decision, released on Wednesday, said “photographs and visual recordings are inherently expressive”, as is the process creating them, ensuring their protection under the First Amendment.



I just really don't know what to say about this ruling.

LINK
This post was edited on 9/20/14 at 8:57 am
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33326 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 8:56 am to
Tape a GoPro to your shoe.

Posted by DirtyDawg
President of the East Cobb Snobs
Member since Aug 2013
15539 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:07 am to
RT^
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:07 am to
DD! Whas goin on mayne
Posted by SpeedyNacho
Member since May 2014
2418 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:11 am to
Why stop at 1, i have 2 feet.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33326 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Why stop at 1, i have 2 feet.


Touché
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15918 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:30 am to
I told everyone that Texas is full of nothing but pervs and sickos (Tbird aside), but nobody would listen to me.
Posted by K9
wayx....BOBO IN '19
Member since Sep 2012
23958 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:42 am to
quote:

I just really don't know what to say about this ruling.




it's fishy
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22836 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:51 am to
Oh you
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111489 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 10:03 am to
Having read the piece, I understand the Court of Appeals issue with the law. And I also firmly believe that each judge should be subjected to photographers who harass them in the same way the victim in this case was.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28780 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 10:36 am to
Freaking Austin.

Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

And I also firmly believe that each judge should be subjected to photographers who harass them in the same way the victim in this case was.


It would be interesting to see their reaction, if someone did the same thing to their wives and daughters as was done to the woman in the article.
Posted by 870Hog
99999 posts
Member since Jul 2011
16189 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 11:20 am to
Tbird is in the land of mizz...
Posted by 870Hog
99999 posts
Member since Jul 2011
16189 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

if someone did the same thing to their wives and daughters as was done to the woman in the article.


Shouldnt have been dressing as a whore. /thread
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Having read the piece, I understand the Court of Appeals issue with the law. And I also firmly believe that each judge should be subjected to photographers who harass them in the same way the victim in this case was.


It makes sense to some degree in both directions.

Here's the problem: A lot of people compare this to bikinis and ask "what's the difference?" between that article of clothing being recorded/photographed and a pair of panties.

I think this is facile to dismiss because a skirt is a clear and present indication that the person wishes that part of their body to remain private, hence the article of clothing.

It's considered a "private" area, and if someone went out of their way to take a picture of it in any other situation it would be a crime.

This upskirt stuff really needs to die and go away, there's no place for it in society.
Posted by KSGamecock
The Woodlands, TX
Member since May 2012
22982 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 1:24 pm to
Is it allowed in Mexico?
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 9/20/14 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Is it allowed in Mexico?


Nah, they're actually starting to take that kind of stuff seriously. Women can board the front of trains in the subway during rush hour so they don't have any contact with men.

There's also been a huge surge in the police force (there are now more cops per person than there are in NYC in MXC).
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 9/21/14 at 4:35 pm to
If you bitches would just quit wearing panties, this wouldnt be a problem.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 9/21/14 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

This upskirt stuff really needs to die and go away, there's no place for it in society.


It never will go away.
This post was edited on 9/21/14 at 4:54 pm
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 9/21/14 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

It never will go away.


Hey, men like looking at twat.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter