Started By
Message
UGA Underachieving...
Posted on 9/14/14 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 9/14/14 at 1:45 pm
again, or were they just overrated after the Clemson game ? I posted earlier that I thought SOS would have something up his sleeve for this game, but I did not see anything special from him during this game. UGA's problems on defense have not been solved, and if you slow down Gurley they are in trouble.
9
Posted on 9/14/14 at 1:54 pm to Irons Puppet
We are a 7-5 team without Gurley. With him we may be a 10-2 team. Anyone who bought into our hype after the Clemson game didn't really know this team
Posted on 9/14/14 at 1:55 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
overrated after the Clemson game
Posted on 9/14/14 at 1:58 pm to Irons Puppet
Oh look. It's another auburn fan starting a thread about Georgia.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 1:59 pm to Irons Puppet
Just living up to a Richt coached team.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:01 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
UGA Underachieving...
Depends on how you look at it
10-2 would be overachieving in most folks eyes but if you expected UGA in the playoff then 10-2 is underachieving.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:03 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
again, or were they just overrated after the Clemson game ?
It's hard to tell, probably both at the same time.
The problem with the Clemson-UGA game, and the problem with ascribing too much merit to any early games, was that there were so many unknowns. Both Clemson and UGA lost a lot since 2013 so one winning over the other didn't tell us much. Same with yesterday...I'm not sure what that game meant yet. It could have been a matchup between two 10-2 or 11-1 type teams or it could have been, and probably was, something much less significant. We won't know until the end of the season.
On the other hand it's Georgia under Richt so it's a given that every year they will underachieve. Considering the money, facilities, fan support and talent available to UGA it's fair to say that they've been underachieving for the past decade.
This post was edited on 9/14/14 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:03 pm to Irons Puppet
Answer: combination of both.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:05 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
On the other hand it's Georgia under Richt so it's a given that every year they will underachieve. Considering the money, facilities, fan support and talent available to UGA it's fair to say that they've been underachieving for the past decade.
We don't even have an indoor practice facility bro, how can you expect us to recruit top tier talent, much less win big games without one?
This post was edited on 9/14/14 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:06 pm to gamatt53
quote:
We are a 7-5 team without Gurley
I agree with this 100%. But you know what, Gurley is on
scholarship with UGA and as long as that guy is healthy, you guys
are a threat.
frick the haters, Run that bitch till he quits
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:06 pm to gamatt53
it's Malware
frickin techy pussy bitchez
frickin techy pussy bitchez
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:06 pm to Red&Black
quote:
We don't even have an indoor practice facility bro, how can you expect us to recruit top tier talent, much less win big games without one?
Georgia Tech doesn't either and I think they won a National Championship recently.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:07 pm to KSGamecock
I started a post this summer asking about Richt's future, if UGA started 0-2. I thought he was safe after the Clemson Game, but the reaction from the UGA Fan yesterday has me wondering. Is the UF Game a tipping point for the fans or will it be AU ?
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:09 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
Georgia Tech doesn't either and I think they won a National Championship recently.
24 yrs recent?
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:09 pm to gatorhata9
quote:
Oh look. It's another auburn fan starting a thread about Georgia.
Are you really the person to lecture another on focusing on a rival, gatorhata
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:10 pm to rb
quote:
24 yrs recent?
Yes. Is 24 years ago that long? I think they're still relevant because of it.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:12 pm to Irons Puppet
Georgia has a pretty good team and an elite player in Gurley. It was mainly their defense that got overrated based on the 2nd half against Clemson. They got torched in the first half.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:13 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
Yes. Is 24 years ago that long? I think they're still relevant because of it.
Considering the vast majority of collegiate athletes are between the ages of 18-22 , it's an eternity.
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:13 pm to xenythx
Georgia will beat Auburn
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:14 pm to rb
quote:
quote:
Yes. Is 24 years ago that long? I think they're still relevant because of it.
Considering the vast majority of collegiate athletes are between the ages of 18-22 , it's an eternity.
So you're saying that they're irrelevant because their NC was 24 years ago?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News