Started By
Message

Qb position for the next few years could really hold Bama back

Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:46 am
Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9741 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:46 am
From reaching the max potential. If Sims is the guy this year, which is fine if he's the best that means next year we'll see a new starter. If that is Coker then again in 16 we'll have a new starter.

I would really rather have one of the younger QBs step up and win the job and be the man for several years. Than have to break in a new Qb every year. I understand that you go with the guy who can better help you win now but surely Bateman or Cornwell have the skill set that could do that now as well as Sims/Coker.

I guess that's part of the reason some want Coker to win the job because he has two years left vs the 1 that Sims has left.

That's the one area that CNS doesn't seem to be able to get experienced depth, seems like there were many opportunities to let back ups play more last year but he never made the switch early in the blow out games.


Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38369 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Than have to break in a new Qb every year


Last two won a national title.

Mccarron did not accomplish this feat as a 3rd year starting senior quarterback but did as a first year starting sophomore. Same can be said for Mcelroy

I think "breaking in a new QB" has proven time and time again recently to be a meaningless metric. Manziel, Winston, Bradford, Mccarron, Newton, Marshall...I mean just look around

I agree that in theory you would rather have a guy settle in and keep the job for 2-3 years as opposed to 1, but it's not someting I think we can point to as "holding us back"
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 10:51 am
Posted by bona fide
Burma
Member since Jun 2010
8972 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:56 am to
Bama will contend for titles every year Saban is there. QB position will be fine, this year and in the future.

Saban has never played backups early in games in order to develop depth, doubt he changes that anytime soon.
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:59 am to
What team has experienced depth at QB? Usually the only way that happens is due to injury and we've been fortunate to not have that issue

Bateman had every opportunity to win the starting QB job this year. He didn't. I'm a Bateman fan but if he's going to play he's going to have to step up and earn it not have it given to him because he's young.
Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9741 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Manziel, Winston, Bradford, Mccarron, Newton, Marshall..


None of those QBs were career back ups getting the job mostly due to seniority. Plus, you listed, what, 4 Heisman QBs which we all know that neither Sims nor Coker are of that caliber of QBs.

Sure we've done great with first time starters but we had insane defense those years, not saying we don't have that now or won't in the future. I would prefer not to need to break in a new Qb each year for the next 3 years in a row.
Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9741 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:09 am to
quote:

step up and earn it not have it given to him because he's young.



Which is exactly what I said in my post. I wish one of the young guys would step up and win the job.
Posted by AllBamaDoesIsWin
Member since Dec 2011
26725 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 11:21 am to
We'll be fine. Besides, that 2016 battle is gonna be something special.

RS Sophomore David Cornwell vs RS Freshman Blake Barnett

If Bateman sticks around, he'll be a RS Junior. I hope he sticks around, he's gonna be really good too.
Posted by WW
Member since Dec 2013
2277 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 1:03 pm to
No offense, but you're a stupid a-hole.

I'm kidding, but I think you're whole thought process is silly.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20758 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 1:35 pm to
I happen to agree. I don't think the mentality that "We won with new QB's before, therefore we will win with new QBs in the future" is something we should be betting on. As I said in the other thread about Sims/Coker, going forward I don't think you can have a National Championship winning team with a QB that can't make plays. The offenses in the SEC are putting so much stress on the defenses right now that you have to have an offense that can score points. If you have a QB that doesn't put you in position for that, you're in trouble. The QB position can't be average and it absolutely can't be a liability. I don't think we could survive this year if either Sims or Coker has a mid-season slump similar to McElroy in 2009.

If you ask me, Alabama is way overdue for a true playmaker at QB.
This post was edited on 9/3/14 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38369 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

"We won with new QB's before, therefore we will win with new QBs in the future" is something we should be betting on


it's not something we should bet against either. Yea, it's ideal that a younger player win the job, but the guy best equipped to do the job right is the one I want playing. Don't really care how old he is. If Sims is an B+ to Coker's B-then I'd rather Sims be back there.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64948 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

None of those QBs were career back ups getting the job mostly due to seniority.


Greg McElroy was.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20758 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

it's not something we should bet against either. Yea, it's ideal that a younger player win the job, but the guy best equipped to do the job right is the one I want playing. Don't really care how old he is. If Sims is an B+ to Coker's B-then I'd rather Sims be back there


I agree. The best player should play and if that happens to be a first year player, then it is what it is. First year players now are a different mold than first year players in the past. They come in a little more ready to play. I guess my criticism is at the mentatlity that we'll be fine because its simply worked out for us in the past.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter