Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Mother indicted for child abuse tells judge she's pregnant

Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:45 pm
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98898 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 10:45 pm
Mother of the Year right here.

quote:

LOUISVILLE, KY (WAVE) - The Louisville woman charged in connection with not feeding her children is pregnant.

On Aug. 28, a Jefferson County grand jury indicted Stephanie Adams, 24, on two counts of criminal abuse. Louisville Metro Police say Adams allowed her twins, a boy and a girl, to be severely malnourished and medically neglected. The one year olds weighed just 11 and 15 pounds.

During a Sept. 2 court appearance, Adams pleaded not guilty and told the judge she was expecting another child in November.


LINK
Posted by BZ853
Member since Aug 2013
1857 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 12:07 am to
Some people should be shot.
Posted by Jma313
Member since Aug 2010
5157 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 1:38 am to
What do pro-lifers think of this?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 4:59 am to
Hope those kids are placed in a good home and the one she is pregnant with, is also. Not sure why you would ask specifically what prolifers think of the situation, unless you believe she should kill the unborn child with an abortion. In which case, life is cheapened just as much as what she has done.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:03 am to
quote:


What do pro-lifers think of this?


That adoption is the solution, not just fricking killing the kid.

Shame on that "mother."
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98898 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:10 am to
FWIW, if we're willing to accept chemical castration as a treatment for sex offenders then I think in cases like this sterilization should be on the table as well.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:14 am to
I cannot disagree with this logic.

Not a fan of that line of thinking across the board, but you can't favor one and shun the other, I agree.
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28801 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:49 am to
Adoption.

Hell, I'd drive to 'Ville in a heartbeat and take the kid. The problem is that the government doesn't like to make adoption easy for anybody. Especially when there's some money to be made.
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:50 am to
quote:

What do pro-lifers think of this?

Her parental rights should be terminated for all of her kids and she should remain in jail until Jesus returns.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 6:54 am to
quote:

What do pro-lifers think of this?


I think if the unborn baby could communicate with us, he/she would say they are OK with adoption or foster care as opposed to the easy alternative.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:30 am to
quote:

What do pro-lifers think of this?


Clearly those children would have been better of had they been executed prior to entering the world, right?
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
28801 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 8:48 am to
quote:

FWIW, if we're willing to accept chemical castration as a treatment for sex offenders then I think in cases like this sterilization should be on the table as well.



wth? am i agreeing with Belle on a social issue?
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

What do pro-lifers think of this?


This pro-lifer says you cant kill the kids after the fact by not feeding them. The two small kids and the in-utero person need to be put up for adoption or placed with responsible family members immediately (or right after birth.)

Parental rights should be terminated permanently for the birth mother.

And where are the (dads) in this?
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98898 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I cannot disagree with this logic.

Not a fan of that line of thinking across the board, but you can't favor one and shun the other, I agree.


I just look at it at this point she clearly doesn't care about the welfare of her children and she's going to continue having children and abusing them. At this point is that any different then a pedophile who won't stop abusing children? Because the abuse still can have physical and psychological effects especially given their developmental age.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter