Started By
Message
The first Sagarin rankings of the season are out
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:14 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:14 am
LINK
2. Alabama
5. TAMU
6. Georgia
9. Auburn
13. LSU
17. Florida
19. South Carolina
21. Ole Miss
37. Tennessee
39. State
42. Mizzou
46. Vanderbilt
59. Arkansas
71. Kentucky
Sagarin puts a LOT of weight into strength of schedule, so Vandy gets a bump for playing temple as opposed to UT-Martin, but that doesn't explain why Arkansas is so low or why Florida is so high.
2. Alabama
5. TAMU
6. Georgia
9. Auburn
13. LSU
17. Florida
19. South Carolina
21. Ole Miss
37. Tennessee
39. State
42. Mizzou
46. Vanderbilt
59. Arkansas
71. Kentucky
Sagarin puts a LOT of weight into strength of schedule, so Vandy gets a bump for playing temple as opposed to UT-Martin, but that doesn't explain why Arkansas is so low or why Florida is so high.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:15 am to DCRebel
I think the 24 point arse whipping explains arkys ranking.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:16 am to DCRebel
quote:
Vandy gets a bump for playing temple as opposed to UT-Martin, but that doesn't explain why Arkansas is so low or why Florida is so high.
getting blown out at home is better than getting blown out on the road to a top 10 team?
Florida has no stength of schedule
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:17 am to DCRebel
Sagarin rankings rarely bare relevance to reality.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:18 am to DCRebel
quote:
6. Georgia
9. Auburn
awww naw
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 9:19 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:19 am to parkjas2001
quote:
I think the 24 point arse whipping explains arkys ranking.
But behind a team which lost by 30 to Temple?
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:19 am to Pavoloco83
so i take it some of you like the bleacher report rankings better.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:19 am to DCRebel
quote:
but that doesn't explain why Arkansas is so low or why Florida is so high.
Or why A&M and Auburn is so low. Going into the game, South Caolina was ranked higher than Clemson.
I mean, we'll take it, but it just seems odd. I don't think any (certainly not many) Georgia fans thought we would go THAT high after only one week.. (#6) I am thinking we should at LEAST wait until we play South Carolina, and maybe Florida. But, as I said, we will definitely take the ranking.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 9:22 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:19 am to DCRebel
Why is Alabama so high? WVU isn't ranked
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:19 am to Rig
quote:
These ratings suck
By the end of the season, they're pretty good.
Week one's not really a good time to judge anything.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:20 am to DCRebel
quote:
behind a team which lost by 30 to Temple?
yeah that is pretty bad. Vandy looked about as bad as a team could possibly look. it's not all on the players though. I think the average SEC rantard could coach better than that abomination Vandy put a headset on.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:20 am to DawgCountry
quote:
awww naw
My toughts exactly. Auburn should be top 5, right now.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:22 am to DawgCountry
nm
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 9:23 am
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:25 am to DCRebel
Auburn is so much better than Bama.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:25 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:...and guess who! I thought they said that BR was a load of crap.
so i take it some of you like the bleacher report rankings better.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:28 am to DCRebel
Sagarin's formula doesn't kick in until after a few games have been played by each team. He's still using preseason rankings.
By the end of September, these should change pretty drastically.
By the end of September, these should change pretty drastically.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:29 am to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
so i take it some of you like the bleacher report rankings better.
Sagarin is on par with Bleacher Report, IMO.
Posted on 9/2/14 at 9:30 am to DCRebel
quote:
17. Florida
A couple more rainouts and we're top 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News