Started By
Message
locked post

Why is Missouri in the SEC East?

Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:59 pm
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:59 pm
Why can't they just put Auburn in the East and Missouri in the West?

Geographically it makes sense, and also the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:59 pm to
36-17
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Why can't they just put Auburn in the East and Missouri in the West?

Geographically it makes sense, and also the SEC can have the possibility of a Bama vs. Auburn SECCG.


Cause we aint changing shite around for shitty arse Mizzou
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:01 pm to
Because Bama wanted them there. When will yall get it?
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:02 pm to
(no message)
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145035 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:02 pm to
because of :rivalry:
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
20285 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:02 pm to
Which ends, UT-Bama or Bama-Auburn?


Yeah, neither
Posted by FourThreeForty
Member since May 2013
17290 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:03 pm to
Because frick Mizzou
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:04 pm to
Because Alabama was scared we would compete for the West
Posted by Harry Rex Vonner
American dissident
Member since Nov 2013
35788 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:04 pm to
because they're Germans
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145035 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Which ends, UT-Bama or Bama-Auburn? Yeah, neither
didn't play for 40 years
Posted by GooseSix
Member since Jun 2012
19496 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Why is Missouri in the SEC ?



Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32479 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Bama-Auburn?



ended for decades. There is precedent for it.

Actually, this may be good for gumps. Take a break, so trees and people don't die every time the barners win
This post was edited on 7/27/14 at 3:07 pm
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95865 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Cause we aint changing shite around for shitty arse Mizzou

We already fricking did
Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:07 pm to
Hating on Mizzou, who finished #5 last year,
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19232 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:07 pm to

Big Daddy Slive wanted his fellow Yankees to have the easiest possible path the the SECCG.

Hence Mizzou + SEC East.



This post was edited on 7/27/14 at 3:09 pm
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37573 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Because B-hama wanted them there. When will yall get it?


FIFY
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32479 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:09 pm to
Honest answer: ain't no way Slive would put another HUNH in Saban's division.

Happy wife, happy life type thing
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:12 pm to
What's the difference?
Posted by Bogie00
Tiger in Kansas
Member since Apr 2012
5703 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 3:59 pm to
Geographically it would make more sense for Mizzou to play in West division, but makes even more sense for Texas to play in West. Both teams could not go to West, and no current West teams wanted to switch out. IMHO

Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter