Started By
Message

A&M and Tech have "mutual interest" in playing in 2020 or beyond

Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:30 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145056 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:30 pm
quote:

kbohls @kbohls
Nice chat with Texas Tech AD Kirby Hocutt. He said TT, A&M have "mutual interest" in scheduling football game "2020 or beyond

Meh
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60119 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:37 pm to
Meh. I'd rather be playing PAC and B1G teams for our P5 game. I'd be okay with a two game set or one neutral site game I guess but not a true series
Posted by wrecking crew
Canada
Member since Apr 2014
1108 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:40 pm to
no thanks, you remember what they did to the team bus in the last game. they are turds
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 6:42 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145056 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:40 pm to
I don't want to play them in Lubbock or jerry world since we are already playing there. Would much rather schedule someone from the B1G, PAC, or ACC
Posted by Agforlife
Somewhere in the Brazos Valley
Member since Nov 2012
20102 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:43 pm to
Ehhh I really don't want to pkay them on a regular basis. I'd rather we expand our horizons and play someone different.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60119 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:43 pm to
San Antonio would get my vote. frick a home and home for sure. And two games tops. Thinking about it though I'd rather just not play them
Posted by finestfirst79
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Member since Nov 2012
11646 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 6:57 pm to
If not for Kingsbury I think most would reject this without a second thought. If it happens I hope it's a neutral site or exclusively at A&M. Lubbock can go to hell.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145056 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:03 pm to
agreed. if not san Antonio we could do Houston. but id rather not play
Posted by dead money
kyle, tx
Member since Feb 2014
1391 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:15 pm to
I'm ok playing them but I'm not in favor of it happening at a neutral site.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60119 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:15 pm to
Normally I'm against neutral site games but frick Lubbock
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145056 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:18 pm to
frick going to Lubbock. one game in kyle field or two games both at a neutral site or one game at kyle field and the other at a neutral site.
Posted by dead money
kyle, tx
Member since Feb 2014
1391 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:23 pm to
Lubbock is a shithole, I agree.... but no one is there to sightsee...lol

If we were theoretically gonna set up a neutral site, let it be in San Diego or something....
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50200 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:35 pm to
The only way this makes sense if to do a 2 for 1 like SMU or Kyle & a neutral site. I don't think Tech will do either.
Posted by AGoodTexan
Texas, USA
Member since Apr 2014
754 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:39 pm to
I'd like the move just because It'll help break the ice with other Big12 AD's in football scheduling.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145056 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:43 pm to
im against playing any big 12 team
This post was edited on 6/17/14 at 7:44 pm
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60119 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

im against playing any big 12 team


I agree in theory but honestly eliminating an entire conference will make it tougher to fill out the P5 requirement and I'm afraid it will put us in an unfavorable negotiating spot. We will see though.
Posted by greenbastard
Parts Unkown
Member since Feb 2014
2740 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 8:32 pm to
Im going to get flamed, but personally I'd rather A&M schedule the Purdues and Rutgers of the P5 conferences. I'm pretty sure going undefeated will lead to a Playoff spot at the end of the season. No need to make our schedule even harder.

Hell, Washington State recently visited Auburn without a return game to Pullman. Let's get something like that set up in our favor.
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21091 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Meh. I'd rather be playing PAC and B1G teams for our P5 game.


Agree. Would be nice variety. And fans that travel would probably prefer going somewhere new.
Posted by Raoul_Duke
Denton, TX
Member since Nov 2012
235 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 9:28 pm to
There's no need to rush to saying yes or no to this. 2020 is so far away that it could be strategically advantageous to play them. Right now that looks like a bad option that does nothing to benefit A&M
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 6/17/14 at 10:00 pm to
Giant "meh".

I'd rather play home and home and have to go to Lubbock than San Antonio. At least Lubbock's a college town with hot skank trim running around. San Antonio is just an awful tourist trap full of strip malls, chain everything, and fat people.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter