Started By
Message

I think Donald Sterling won...

Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:22 pm
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:22 pm
He's agreed to sell the Clippers to a former Microsoft CEO for $2 billion dollars.


LINK
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 6:24 pm
Posted by mre
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2009
3090 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:23 pm to
That'll teach him.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39970 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:23 pm to
I thought I say he'll have to pay a capital gains tax on that which will be astronomical.
Posted by reggierayreb
Germantown
Member since Nov 2012
16948 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:38 pm to
I took the numbers to the capital gains tax calculator on moneychimp.com (Jesus, the irony... Not being racist, just sayin) and considering Sterling is in the 39% Federal tax bracket and Cali's state tax is out of this world (I calculated for 20%) for someone of his financial standing I'm thinking he takes home less than 850 million after the sale.



ETA: I'm sure he has a high priced tax attorney on retainer that will help him out so maybe he pockets 900 million of it.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 6:43 pm
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:44 pm to
Let him think that like the fool he is.

The goal wasn't to bankrupt him.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111496 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

The goal wasn't to bankrupt him.

There was no "goal." The NBA is scared of bad press and the NBA owners didn't want to look like they were supporting a racist.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Let him think that like the fool he is.

The goal wasn't to bankrupt him.


I doubt it was for a bidding war that ends up with him pocketing $2 billion though.

12.5 million into 2 billion. That's some cabbage there.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 6:53 pm
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:55 pm to
quote:

I doubt it was for a bidding war that ends up with him pocketing $2 billion though.


The NBA knew this was going to happen. A valuable franchise in LA? How could it not?

Some folks are acting like this is some moral victory for Sterling when the fact of the matter is forcing him out of the league was the punishment in and of itself.

The NBA was never trying to stop him from profiting from the sale. Hell, they were the ones who recommended it to begin with
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 6:56 pm
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

There was no "goal."


Yes there was.

quote:

The NBA is scared of bad press


As they should be.

quote:

the NBA owners didn't want to look like they were supporting a racist.


Good.


Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111496 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:57 pm to
None of those are actual goals. They're just reactions.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

A valuable franchise in LA?


$2 billion valuable? Haven't they only had like 5 winning seasons in their history or something like that?



quote:

forcing him out of the league was the punishment in and of itself


Understand. But if he gets a much higher price because they are so zealous in him being removed, then he has accomplished somewhat of a moral victory at their expense. Figuratively and literally.

eta - according to Forbes, just this January, the Clippers weren't in the top 11 in value of NBA teams. 11th ranked team in value was at $660 million.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 7:01 pm
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

None of those are actual goals. They're just reactions.


Setting a goal as a reaction to something doesn't make it any less a goal.

The goal was to force Sterling out of the NBA fraternity. That goal is accomplished.

Like I said, no one is trying to bankrupt the man.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111496 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:01 pm to
Fair enough. I'm never a big fan of knee jerking. But to each their own.
Posted by Hardy_Har
MS
Member since Nov 2012
16285 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:02 pm to
Lakers suck right now. Seems to be a good time to buy.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

$2 billion valuable? Haven't they only had like 5 winning seasons in their history or something like that?


They are currently the marquee team in LA and a championship contender. They've had an abysmal past, but their present and future outlooks are what make them valuable.

quote:

if he gets a much higher price because they are so zealous in him being removed, then he has accomplished somewhat of a moral victory at their expense. Figuratively and literally.


Not necessarily.

The NBA did the right thing in removing him post haste.

Whether he profits from it is of little consequence. He's a multi billionaire. Any monetary gains from the sale or fines from a punishment were going to be a pittance.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 7:04 pm
Posted by reggierayreb
Germantown
Member since Nov 2012
16948 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Lakers suck right now. Seems to be a good time to sell.


fify





I guess it really depends on how you look at it
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

The NBA did the right thing in removing him post haste


Not the issue at hand. The overinflated profit as a result of the post haste move is. It's akin to the NAACP paying the KKK 10 times the cost of their robes, just to de-robe them.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46505 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:09 pm to
The NBA drastically overreacted to this, though they had the right to do so just like Sterling has the right to turn a 200 fold profit on his initial investment.

Glad this is all over.
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:11 pm to
These guys don't buy these teams to make a profit. He was already an 81 year old billionaire. Now he will still be an 81 year old billionaire.

They buy these teams for the social standing, have their own real life fantasy teams, and be a part of an elite fraternity.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 5/29/14 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

Not the issue at hand.


I disagree.

quote:

The overinflated profit


That's just the free market at work. Like I said, the Clippers are an insanely hot commodity right now.

quote:

It's akin to the NAACP paying the KKK 10 times the cost of their robes, just to de-robe them.


That analogy doesn't work in the slightest, Hunter

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter