Started By
Message
South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:46 am
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:46 am
They've been an above average program for about 4 years.
Before 2010, what was the overall status of their football program? Poor, decent, good, or great? Considering their overall history, I'd rank their program pre-2010 as somewhere between poor and decent with rare flashes of good.
You may wonder where I'm going with this. I keep reading on the rant that after Spurrier leaves, South Carolina will surely hire a superstar coach because people across this country now see the "potential" of the South Carolina program.
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
Don't you think that SCar needs to prove themselves a bit more before we can jump to that conclusion?
:nb4freerentinyourheadcomments:
:nb4cocksessed:
:nb4anythingcommentbyscrewster:
:nb4fieldgoalgif:
:nb4cocksownMizzou:
:nb4SECChampionshipgamedoesn'tmatter...webeatyou:
:nb4you'retheworstposteronthissite:
:nb4howhaveyounotbeenbannedyet?:
:nb4CockBlockit'sunoriginalyetpredictableresponse:
:nb4weinyourhead:
Before 2010, what was the overall status of their football program? Poor, decent, good, or great? Considering their overall history, I'd rank their program pre-2010 as somewhere between poor and decent with rare flashes of good.
You may wonder where I'm going with this. I keep reading on the rant that after Spurrier leaves, South Carolina will surely hire a superstar coach because people across this country now see the "potential" of the South Carolina program.
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
Don't you think that SCar needs to prove themselves a bit more before we can jump to that conclusion?
:nb4freerentinyourheadcomments:
:nb4cocksessed:
:nb4anythingcommentbyscrewster:
:nb4fieldgoalgif:
:nb4cocksownMizzou:
:nb4SECChampionshipgamedoesn'tmatter...webeatyou:
:nb4you'retheworstposteronthissite:
:nb4howhaveyounotbeenbannedyet?:
:nb4CockBlockit'sunoriginalyetpredictableresponse:
:nb4weinyourhead:
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:52 am
15
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:47 am to mizzoukills
They are historically one of the worst programs in college football. They've been OK since Holtz got there.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:49 am to mizzoukills
Why do you start so many threads?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:50 am to TreyAnastasio
TreyAnastasio
To receive this response from you.
quote:
Why do you start so many threads?
To receive this response from you.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:50 am to mizzoukills
quote:
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
No. An emerging SEC power.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:51 am to Stonehog
quote:
They are historically one of the worst programs in college football. They've been OK since Holtz got there.
Pretty much.
Pre-2001: Honestly one of the worst programs ever
2001-2009: Big step forward, turned it around into being respectable/pretty good
2010-2013: Another step, turned into being very good.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:51 am to Mizz-SEC
Guys stop being so mean to uscE; there is nothing wrong with second place. They worked very hard for that, and I think they should be proud.
FRUIT ROLLUPS FOR ALL YOU COCKS!
FRUIT ROLLUPS FOR ALL YOU COCKS!
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 10:52 am
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:51 am to mizzoukills
They're Baylor with a penis mascot
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:53 am to Mizzoufan26
Since when did the SEC start handing out second place ribbons for divisional championships?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:53 am to mizzoukills
From 2000 to about 2010 they were average and I would dare call them elite from that point on. South Carolina does have a lot of potential as a program and wouldn't be surprised to see them take a chance on Chad Morris if Spurrier retires. This would do two things, give a big frick you to Clemson and take away Clemson's biggest recruiting tool. it would be a risk but the payoff could be huge.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:53 am to Gradual_Stroke
They will forever be Clemson's bitch
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:54 am to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
They're Baylor with a penis mascot
That's actually a legit comparison!
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:55 am to TigerNick23
quote:
Since when did the SEC start handing out second place ribbons for divisional championships?
Since Alabama parlayed their 2011 2nd place SEC West finish into Saban begging for a do-over on national TV in the hopes of getting just one more chance to get it right?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:55 am to mizzoukills
So for attention. Got it. Did mommy not say I love you enough?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:57 am to Warfarer
quote:
From 2000 to about 2010 they were average and I would dare call them elite from that point on
I think it's funny that they've been solid for 3-4 years and all of the sudden they now have incredible potential, yet Mizzou has been extremely solid and at times damn near elite for 10+ years and we have zero potential.
Laughably retarded.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 10:58 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:
TreyAnastasio
You're still here...
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:00 am to Warfarer
quote:
From 2000 to about 2010 they were average and I would dare call them elite from that point on
So how many teams in cfb are elite, like 20? Elite is just that..elite. Best of the best. Cream of the crop.
From 2011-2013 bama has been elite. Oregon has been up there. I'm sure a few others.
Carolina in that time frame has zero BCS bowls, zero SEC titles, and zero division titles. In fact, all they do have in that time frame is a few bowl wins. You are off your rocker if you think a team that hasn't won a damn thing of consequence can be considered "elite", by any measure.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:01 am to mizzoukills
quote:
I think it's funny that they've been solid for 3-4 years
3 or 4 ten win seasons is about as good a run as any team has minus bama winning 2 out of 3 NC. I don't know anything about Mizzo except it is far away and you got your arse handed to you last year when it counted and I was watching. I've been to South Carolina and looks like I will be going up for a wedding later this year and it is a beautiful area and I have met a lot of good people in Columbia.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:03 am to WG_Dawg
From 2011 - 2013 USCjr has won absolutely nothing of relevance and that explains the intense penis envy they have over Mizzou. It's both flattering and creepy.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:05 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Oregon has been up there
what has made Oregon elite in that same time frame? What have they walked away with in that time frame that means anything? Some Pac 12 championships? Realistically, USCe could have walked away with a few Pac 12 championships in that time frame.
The past 4 years for USCe is 9-5, 11-2, 11-2 an 11-2. That is pretty fricking elite if you ask me. Not to mention three top 10 finishes in a row.
Page 1 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News