Started By
Message
Your team's record vs the AQ conferences?
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:44 pm
Or at least what used to be the AQ conferences (B1G, ACC, PAC 12, Big 12, and the Big East/AAC). I got bored and then inspired by the thread talking about what your team has done vs OOC teams and I decided to see how UGA did vs other conferences. For clarity's sake I did the math for what conferences the teams are in now so I didn't include Mizzou or A&M and for teams like Colorado and Nebraska I added them to the PAC 12 and B1G.
GEORGIA:
ACC: 138-81-14
GT: 64-37-5
Clemson: 41-18-4
Duke: 1-0-0
BC: 2-2-0
FSU: 6-4-0
Maryland: 2-3-1
UNC: 16-12-2
NC State: 6-1-1
Pitt: 0-3-1
Syracuse: 0-1-0
B1G: 7-5-0
Michigan: 1-1-0
MSU: 2-1-0
Nebraska: 1-2-0
Ohio State: 1-0-0 (beat that twat herbie)
PSU: 0-1-0
Purdue: 2-0-0
Big 12: 14-5-0
Baylor: 4-0-0
Oklahoma State: 3-1-0
Texas: 1-3-0
TCU: 3-0-0
Texas Texh: 3-0-0
WVU: 0-1-0
(no picture because I guess Cincy and Temple aren't worthy of taking pics of)
Big East/AAC: 6-0-0
Cincy: 2-0-0
Temple: 4-0-0
PAC-12: 11-6-1
Arizona: 0-0-1
Arizona State: 2-0-0
Cal: 2-0-0
Colorado: 1-1-0
Oregon: 1-0-0
Oregon State: 3-1-0
USC: 0-3-0
Stanford: 0-1-0
UCLA: 2-0-0
So, how'd yalls teams do? And eat a big ol' dick ACC.
GEORGIA:
ACC: 138-81-14
GT: 64-37-5
Clemson: 41-18-4
Duke: 1-0-0
BC: 2-2-0
FSU: 6-4-0
Maryland: 2-3-1
UNC: 16-12-2
NC State: 6-1-1
Pitt: 0-3-1
Syracuse: 0-1-0
B1G: 7-5-0
Michigan: 1-1-0
MSU: 2-1-0
Nebraska: 1-2-0
Ohio State: 1-0-0 (beat that twat herbie)
PSU: 0-1-0
Purdue: 2-0-0
Big 12: 14-5-0
Baylor: 4-0-0
Oklahoma State: 3-1-0
Texas: 1-3-0
TCU: 3-0-0
Texas Texh: 3-0-0
WVU: 0-1-0
(no picture because I guess Cincy and Temple aren't worthy of taking pics of)
Big East/AAC: 6-0-0
Cincy: 2-0-0
Temple: 4-0-0
PAC-12: 11-6-1
Arizona: 0-0-1
Arizona State: 2-0-0
Cal: 2-0-0
Colorado: 1-1-0
Oregon: 1-0-0
Oregon State: 3-1-0
USC: 0-3-0
Stanford: 0-1-0
UCLA: 2-0-0
So, how'd yalls teams do? And eat a big ol' dick ACC.
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:14 pm
11
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:49 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
ACC: 157-96-19
What is it without the Georgia Tech series?
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:49 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Is there a way to do this on Stassen? I'm interested but ours is going to involve a lot of math with our migration of conferences
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:50 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
ACC: 157-96-19
Now take out GT and Clemson.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:51 pm to Henry Jones Jr
A thorough thumping of Clemson for years and years combined with a much smaller thumping of USCe when they were in the ACC.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:53 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Now take out GT and Clemson.
52-41-10
But luckily GT and Clemson count dammit
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:54 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
But luckily GT and Clemson count dammit
They do. I was just curious to see how UGA did against the rest...looks fairly even.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:54 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Is there a way to do this on Stassen? I'm interested but ours is going to involve a lot of math with our migration of conferences
Idk, I just flipped through our online media guide and tallied up all the schools from other conferences. Only took me about 10 min with excel.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:56 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
They do. I was just curious to see how UGA did against the rest...looks fairly even.
UGA vs the ACC outside of CU and GT
Duke: 1-0-0
BC: 2-2-0
FSU: 6-4-0
Maryland: 2-3-1
UNC: 16-12-2
NC State: 6-1-1
Pitt (all came while they were independent I think?) : 0-3-1
Syracuse: 0-1-0
ETA: may as well add the teams to my list
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:57 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
Maryland: 2-3-1
Posted on 3/25/14 at 4:58 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
looks fairly even.
Similar to the GT/AU series? And can somebody explain to me how that is the case? Makes no sense to me.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:03 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
parkjas2001
IT WAS BACK IN THE DAY
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:06 pm to Damn Good Dawg
So my first round of math was shite so it actually changed
without GT and CU our ACC record would be
ACC: 138-81-14
- GT: 64-37-5
- Clemson: 41-18-4
33-26-5
without GT and CU our ACC record would be
ACC: 138-81-14
- GT: 64-37-5
- Clemson: 41-18-4
33-26-5
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:16 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Meh telling these kind of records would take a lot of work with all the switching around.
How games vs SC and FSU were while they were actually in the ACC, etc.
How games vs SC and FSU were while they were actually in the ACC, etc.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:17 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
Meh telling these kind of records would take a lot of work with all the switching around.
How games vs SC and FSU were while they were actually in the ACC, etc.
That's why I did it as it is now. Just for fun and to see how we stack up against teams in the conferences of today. Otherwise you gotta factor in independence and weird other conferences And even with the difference in conferences it still gives a general idea of what's up
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:19 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Well I know we are 1-1 vs the PAC-12.
1-1 vs So.Cal. That's it.
1-1 vs So.Cal. That's it.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:21 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Since 1920
Big Ten: 7-4
Big East: 3-2
Pac 12: 1-1
ACC: 162-173-15
Big XII: 4-7
Big Ten: 7-4
Big East: 3-2
Pac 12: 1-1
ACC: 162-173-15
Big XII: 4-7
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:23 pm to Damn Good Dawg
ACC 19-2-0
Big 12 2-1-0
Big East 2-1-0
Big Eight 7-8-1
Big Ten 7-4-1
Independent 87-33-1
Pac-10 13-2-0
Pac-12 1-0-0
Pacific Coast (first incarnation of the Pac) 1-1-0
SWC 96-49-11
WAC 13-1-0
Full results in link here.
Big 12 2-1-0
Big East 2-1-0
Big Eight 7-8-1
Big Ten 7-4-1
Independent 87-33-1
Pac-10 13-2-0
Pac-12 1-0-0
Pacific Coast (first incarnation of the Pac) 1-1-0
SWC 96-49-11
WAC 13-1-0
Full results in link here.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:25 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
Nice, guys. ToG, you went balls to the walls on your analysis
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:25 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Using Stassen.com 1920-2013
Bama vs:
ACC 33-4 89.2%
PAC12 13-5-1 71.1%
SEC 443-179-25 70.4%
B1G 9-4 69.2%
BIG12 10-9-1 52.5%
BIG East 2-1 66.7%
Bama vs:
ACC 33-4 89.2%
PAC12 13-5-1 71.1%
SEC 443-179-25 70.4%
B1G 9-4 69.2%
BIG12 10-9-1 52.5%
BIG East 2-1 66.7%
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News