Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 16
Started By
Message
locked post

Is there anyone who thinks AU shouldnt claim 2004?

Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:53 am
Posted by All4Qtrs
tCapitol
Member since Nov 2013
1056 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:53 am
seriously, there is not a Champ for that year. AU finished #2, with USC vacated that only leaves AU at the top. Its the only other one i think we have a legit claim to. Curious to what rant thinks
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

there is not a Champ for that year.


Yes there is. USC.
Posted by Eric Nies Grind Time
Atlanta GA - ITP
Member since Sep 2012
24933 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

AU finished #2


There's your answer.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49218 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:54 am to
Yes
Posted by TFS4E
Washington DC
Member since Nov 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:54 am to
I think this thread has teh AIDS
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Yes there is. USC.


says who?
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:55 am to
hope not.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49218 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:55 am to
USC
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45136 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
USC won the title that year. They were the best team in the nation. Being vacated doesn't change that.
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

says who?


Everyone
Posted by wartiger2004
Proud LGB Supporter!
Member since Aug 2011
17814 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
Because of us and what happened in 04 we are getting the playoff system which is good enough for me.
Posted by Tornado Alley
Member since Mar 2012
26491 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
On a neutral field, 2004 USC beats 2004 Auburn 45-10
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30179 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
CLAIM it AU!
Posted by wartiger2004
Proud LGB Supporter!
Member since Aug 2011
17814 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
Doubtful
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

says who?




Everyone


Obviously not. i dont so thats not everyone.
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49218 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
And 2007 along with 2011
Posted by All4Qtrs
tCapitol
Member since Nov 2013
1056 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
USC was vacated. I dont think we should just start claiming titles. just curious what the other fanbases think
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66330 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
Personally i think you were the best team int eh country.

if there was a SammyTiger poll you would be #1.

SO you can claim that the Posthumous SammyTiger Poll champs
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

there is not a Champ for that year.


Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
24836 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Is there anyone who thinks AU shouldnt claim 2004?


seriously, there is not a Champ for that year. AU finished #2, with USC vacated that only leaves AU at the top. Its the only other one i think we have a legit claim to. Curious to what rant thinks


I'm sure most people, including Auburn fans, think AU shouldn't claim 2004.

There was a championship game, and unfortunately for Auburn, two other teams qualified for it.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter