Started By
Message
Bret has support from 24 other coaches.., but 93 are opposed to the new rule..
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:46 pm
Brandon Marcello ?@bmarcello 1m
RT @McMurphyESPN: In @ESPN poll of all 128 FBS coaches, only 25 favor 10-second rule proposal
Still, I expect it to pass, even though 103 are opposed to the new rule....
RT @McMurphyESPN: In @ESPN poll of all 128 FBS coaches, only 25 favor 10-second rule proposal
Still, I expect it to pass, even though 103 are opposed to the new rule....
This post was edited on 2/26/14 at 10:28 pm
10
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:49 pm to allin2010
So 19% get to make the rules for the other 81%?
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:49 pm to allin2010
It said 25 are in favor, that doesn't mean that 103 are opposed. For all we know 100 of the coaches polled just don't give a shite. Which I assume is the case with half of them.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:50 pm to allin2010
gus and freeze have a lot of coaches to kill
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:50 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
It said 25 are in favor, that doesn't mean that 103 are opposed. For all we know 100 of the coaches polled just don't give a shite. Which I assume is the case with half of them.
Woah take it easy there with your common sense. There's no place for that here.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:52 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
So 19% get to make the rules for the other 81%?
That's the American way now. Minority rules
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:54 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
gus and freeze have a lot of coaches to kill
Welcome to the list, gentleman
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:54 pm to TheCheshireHog
The only rules that need to be fine tuned are rules allowing ample time for defensive substitutions when the offensive makes substitutions.
The rest of this nonsense makes those proposing look like pansies. It isnt about player safety, its about competitive advantage. Which begs the question, if there is a marked "advantage" for teams running the HUNH, why the need to hide behind "player safety"?
Its so transparent that it's laughable.
The rest of this nonsense makes those proposing look like pansies. It isnt about player safety, its about competitive advantage. Which begs the question, if there is a marked "advantage" for teams running the HUNH, why the need to hide behind "player safety"?
Its so transparent that it's laughable.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:55 pm to kilo
Player safety will always win out
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:55 pm to jvilletiger25
Latest Tweet...(So he can still work on the 9 coaches that are undecided... Still 91 are opposed to the new rule vs. 25 favoring the coward/Saban Rule, with 9 undecided... Feel Better...
In @ESPN poll of 128 coaches about 10-second rule proposal, 73% opposed, 19.5% in favor, 7% undecided
In @ESPN poll of 128 coaches about 10-second rule proposal, 73% opposed, 19.5% in favor, 7% undecided
This post was edited on 2/26/14 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:55 pm to allin2010
the fix was already in when Saban came out for it. told y'all dat
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:57 pm to Pigfeet
quote:
Player safety will always win out
Such a chicken shite argument.
I want to see the "data" they claim to have that backs up their whining.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:58 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
It said 25 are in favor, that doesn't mean that 103 are opposed. For all we know 100 of the coaches polled just don't give a shite. Which I assume is the case with half of them.
Yep, most probably don't care since it will not impact their style of play. However, they might glad when they face a hurry up offense that would have prevented them from making substitutions on defense or incur penalties for doing so. The issue is not really the 10 seconds; the issue is that if a hurry up offense is ready to snap the ball quickly every down and does so while the defense is trying to substitute, the offense picks up an easy 5 yard penalty every time they catch the defense doing so.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:58 pm to kilo
quote:
The only rules that need to be fine tuned are rules allowing ample time for defensive substitutions when the offensive makes substitutions.
They should just go back to the old 25 second play clock rule. The defense could sub and teams were still able to run hurry up offenses
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:58 pm to RebFeBrees
quote:
Such a chicken shite argument.
Meh, that tool is trolling man. Best to just ignore that side of bacon.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:58 pm to kilo
quote:
The only rules that need to be fine tuned are rules allowing ample time for defensive substitutions when the offensive makes substitutions.
The rest of this nonsense makes those proposing look like pansies. It isnt about player safety, its about competitive advantage. Which begs the question, if there is a marked "advantage" for teams running the HUNH, why the need to hide behind "player safety"?
Its so transparent that it's laughable.
Fantastic goddamn post.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 1:59 pm to RebFeBrees
quote:
I want to see the "data" they claim to have that backs up their whining.
Bret's Evidence...
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:00 pm to LSU1NSEC
Let's guess on the names of some of those 25.
Muschamp, Saban,BB, Miles and Mason in the SEC.
Muschamp, Saban,BB, Miles and Mason in the SEC.
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:00 pm to allin2010
Bert "Death Certificates" Bielema
Posted on 2/26/14 at 2:01 pm to skirpnasty
quote:
It said 25 are in favor, that doesn't mean that 103 are opposed. For all we know 100 of the coaches polled just don't give a shite. Which I assume is the case with half of them.
The poll had three options:
1. Favor
2. Opposed
3. Undecided.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News