Started By
Message
Cumulative Point Total Victory Margin In Sugar Bowl During BCS Era (Bama's Last)
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:50 pm
Georgia +41
LSU +30 (+51 if you only count the actual Sugar Bowl)
Auburn +3
Florida 0
Arkansas -5
Alabama -7 (-28 if you only count actual Sugar Bowl appearances)
Note: I included BCSNCG into the Sugar Bowl total because the +1 game was relatively new to the arrangement. In years where there was the +1, I would just count it as two Sugar Bowls. This actually helps Alabama quite a bit, by the way, and hurts LSU dropping them to second place.
LSU +30 (+51 if you only count the actual Sugar Bowl)
Auburn +3
Florida 0
Arkansas -5
Alabama -7 (-28 if you only count actual Sugar Bowl appearances)
Note: I included BCSNCG into the Sugar Bowl total because the +1 game was relatively new to the arrangement. In years where there was the +1, I would just count it as two Sugar Bowls. This actually helps Alabama quite a bit, by the way, and hurts LSU dropping them to second place.
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:52 pm to AlaTiger
wow, Bama's would really suck without the LSU game(21-0).
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:54 pm to AlaTiger
We're all obsessed with each other
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:55 pm to TH03
That last game was the only time that you had the extra game for the Sugar Bowl, so I added it in anyway.
Without it, LSU would be at +51 and in first place and Alabama would be at -28. See, I am trying to be nice.
Without it, LSU would be at +51 and in first place and Alabama would be at -28. See, I am trying to be nice.
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:56 pm to AlaTiger
but it wasn't the sugar bowl. it was the BCS title game.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:57 pm to bona fide
quote:
bona fide Cumulative Point Total Victory Margin In Sugar Bowls During BCS Era wow, Bama's would really suck without the LSU game(21-0).
Yeah, unless you are playing LSU in New Orleans, you should not go. Apparently, LSU is the only team you can get up for.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 6:59 pm to TH03
Yeah, I know. I was throwing them a bone.
See my edit.
When LSU played in 2003 and 2007, it was the Sugar Bowl. Then, the +1 came later.
So, if you take away that 2007 mulligan bowl/fiasco, Alabama should decline to play in the Sugar Bowl from now on. Their fans get arrested and attack people and their team gets blown out.
See my edit.
When LSU played in 2003 and 2007, it was the Sugar Bowl. Then, the +1 came later.
So, if you take away that 2007 mulligan bowl/fiasco, Alabama should decline to play in the Sugar Bowl from now on. Their fans get arrested and attack people and their team gets blown out.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 7:28 pm to AlaTiger
Did the Sugar Bowl start in the BCS era?
Posted on 2/8/14 at 7:42 pm to nc14
No, but it became a BCS bowl in the Sugar Bowl era and fundamentally changed how its participants were chosen.
I know that Alabama was irrelevant throughout the first 2/3 of the BCS Era, but for the rest of us, football started before 2008. Try and keep up, k?
I know that Alabama was irrelevant throughout the first 2/3 of the BCS Era, but for the rest of us, football started before 2008. Try and keep up, k?
Posted on 2/8/14 at 8:56 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
When LSU played in 2003 and 2007, it was the Sugar Bowl. Then, the +1 came later
Nope. The +1 started in 2006 (Boise/OU Fiesta Bowl then Florida/OSU one week later. 2007 Hawaii and UGA were the Sugar Bowl and then LSU/OSU a week later.
And congrats on LSU's 6-7 all time record in the Sugar Bowl
This post was edited on 2/8/14 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 2/8/14 at 9:01 pm to BamaDude06
the games were played in 2007 genius. 2007 sugar bowl was ND-LSU
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:10 pm to AlaTiger
I joked that the next time we get a Sugar Bowl invite.... we should just decline and go to Orlando
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:46 pm to BamaDude06
quote:
Nope. The +1 started in 2006 (Boise/OU Fiesta Bowl then Florida/OSU one week later. 2007 Hawaii and UGA were the Sugar Bowl and then LSU/OSU a week later.
Ah, gotcha. Thanks. Well, I did it right the first time anyway.
Alabama is still last in point differential.
As for LSU's all time record there in bowl games, we're 4-1 since the BCS started, and that is kind of what this post is about. So . . .
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:56 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
but for the rest of us, football started before 2008.
Yes. And some of us, football started before 2000.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 10:58 pm to harmonics
quote:
Yes. And some of us, football started before 2000.
Yes, and for some, they harken back to the days of the leather helmets.
This post is about the BCS era. Why would you be trying to expand it past that?
I am talking about point differentials of Sugar Bowl/BCS games in New Orleans during the BCS era.
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:00 pm to AlaTiger
quote:
This post is about the BCS era. Why would you be trying to expand it past that?
Why did you speak directly of 2008?
Posted on 2/8/14 at 11:12 pm to harmonics
Because that is the first time that Alabama went to the Sugar Bowl since the BCS Era started and since 1992.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News