Would the SEC change SECCG requirements if the rules are relaxed?

ACC commish John Swofford is pushing for rule changes because the ACC title game has been such an abortion.

LINK

quote:

---

If the NCAA lifted its title-game requirements, Swofford said the ACC would consider having the top two teams in the league play for the ACC championship, in addition to maintaining divisions, but not requiring teams to play every opponent in their division.

"If those requirements were lifted, it gives you much more flexibility in how you schedule," Swofford said. "I'm a proponent of the conferences having the autonomy to determine how they do those things."

---

Would the SEC do something similar though? Like have 2 permanent opponents, 3 rotating division opponents and 3 rotating cross division opponents (assuming 2 divisions and 8 game conference schedules) and take the top 2 records regardless of division?

iirc the way the rules are set up now would prevent a 16 team conference from having 4 divisions and forces the conference to either not have divisions or have 2 division of 8 teams

Changing the rules could open the door for the much ballyhooed 16 team superconferences giving them the ability to have 4 divisions and either set up a playoff of 4 division winner or (more likely imo) allow the conference championship game to have the two teams with the best record, regardless of division affiliation