Started By
Message
You got to be kidding me?
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:23 pm
Really Gumps?
Scroll down after the longest post in history.
Entitled???
"does the SEC not award division ties anymore? I know we don't claim them like Auburn and ole miss, but didn't we technically tie for the division?"
Scroll down after the longest post in history.
Entitled???
"does the SEC not award division ties anymore? I know we don't claim them like Auburn and ole miss, but didn't we technically tie for the division?"
7
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:26 pm to TigerTool461
The sec does award in case of ties. They were considered West Champs this season..
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:27 pm to oR33Do
Who was considered West Champs? AU?
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:27 pm to TigerTool461
How bout you reply to the poster that actually posted it? Dipshit.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:27 pm to TigerTool461
Nope...no one's kidding you.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:30 pm to thatdude1985
They should. No ties in the West. AU got head to head. Sec champs.....Lulz.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:30 pm to TigerTool461
quote:
"does the SEC not award division ties anymore? I know we don't claim them like Auburn and ole miss, but didn't we technically tie for
That guy's a genius
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:31 pm to TigerTool461
quote:
"does the SEC not award division ties anymore? I know we don't claim them like Auburn and ole miss, but didn't we technically tie for the division?"
Typical delusional hypocritical gump, not to be confused with the non gump bama fan.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:33 pm to TigerTool461
Banner time!! 
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:34 pm to TigerTool461
They both went 7-1, so yes, they did tie. Hence the "tiebreaker" used, which was head-to-head matchup in this case.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:35 pm to NYCAuburn
The fact that AU beat them, won the SEC champ game and think there was a possible tie......laughable. Delusional, entitled, 
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:38 pm to TigerTool461
Again, that thing they used to determine who went to the SECCG is called a TIEbreaker. It breaks ties. Which there was. The word 'tie' is literally in the name. 7-1 is the same record as 7-1.
But if this was 1941, they probably claim a national title. Now they have people that contest that shite these days.
But if this was 1941, they probably claim a national title. Now they have people that contest that shite these days.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:39 pm to AirRaidTT
They hand out trophies for ties? Awesome. 
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:40 pm to TigerTool461
quote:
"does the SEC not award division ties anymore? I know we don't claim them like Auburn and ole miss, but didn't we technically tie for the division?"
Seent it - WITAF
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:41 pm to fillmoregandt
quote:
Banner time!!
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:41 pm to HaloWarriors
Someone gets it lol.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:43 pm to TigerTool461
Yeah, they actually do. Not kidding. They to it in every conference. It's kind of dumb, but technically Auburn and Bama were co-champs of the SEC West.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 8:44 pm
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:46 pm to AirRaidTT
I may be mistaken but I believe they designate it champs and co-champs
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:47 pm to AirRaidTT
Wow......they award ties? That is gayer than aids. That's as bad as being happy with a BCS co-champs......oh wait.....thanks Reggie.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:50 pm to NYCAuburn
I think you're right about that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News