Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Playoff Committee Controversy

Posted on 12/4/13 at 9:55 am
Posted by Dice410
Metro NashVegas
Member since Aug 2012
1260 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 9:55 am
I wonder if all polls will cease to exist as not to influence the committee. I know for a fact that the Harris poll (Made strictly for the BCS) will no longer exist.

Here's the thing though: if they keep the AP as well as the Coaches Poll there will always be a discrepancy as the committe will never just pick the Top 4 ranked teams. We would not even need the committee if that was the case. Some of the members have already come out and said that conference champs should take precedence over others which I completely agree with since the conference championship games are actually "playoff" games.
Posted by The Nino
Member since Jan 2010
21519 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 9:57 am to
As long as money can be made off of the polls (giggity), they will be made
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 9:57 am to
quote:

the committe will never just pick the Top 4 ranked teams.
sometimes they will
quote:

that conference champs should take precedence over others which I completely agree with since the conference championship games are actually "playoff" games.
And what about conferences that don't have championship games?
Posted by Politiceaux
Member since Feb 2009
17654 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 9:59 am to
I honestly wish they'd have just used the same formula and had the playoff between the top four instead of a committee.
Posted by Aux Arc
SW Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
2184 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 9:59 am to
quote:

And what about conferences that don't have championship games?


They should be forced to have them.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:00 am to
quote:

They should be forced to have them.

Well they're not going to be. So where do we go from there?
Posted by Dice410
Metro NashVegas
Member since Aug 2012
1260 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:01 am to
All of the majors with the exception of the Big 12 have Championship games. Anyone know why the Big 12 stopped? Was it because Mizzou and aTm came over to the league?
Posted by Bama54
Neverland
Member since Nov 2011
5017 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:02 am to
quote:

And what about conferences that don't have championship games?


And what about ones that aren't in a conference?
Posted by lsufan31
MS
Member since Mar 2013
2176 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:03 am to
Im a firm beleiver that if you do not win your conference- you have no business being in the National championship game, period.
Posted by Dice410
Metro NashVegas
Member since Aug 2012
1260 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:03 am to
I can already see it... This new format will be more controversial than what we have now. The "committee" is way too politicized.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:03 am to
A 10 team conference is not allowed to have a championship game according to NCAA regs
Posted by GumpInLex
Lexington, KY
Member since Nov 2011
1617 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:04 am to
They no longer have 12 teams
Posted by LSUDonMCO
Orlando
Member since Dec 2003
6814 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:04 am to
quote:

conference champs should take precedence over others


You just made the Gumps start crying again
Posted by Dice410
Metro NashVegas
Member since Aug 2012
1260 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:05 am to
Definitely! But what about ND?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:06 am to
In your head
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Im a firm beleiver that if you do not win your conference- you have no business being in the National championship game, period.
I think in MOST years that would absolutely be the case, but there are always exceptions to the rule. Hypothetical...No undefeated teams. 2 teams in the Sec West with 1 loss each, but the West Champ loses to a 3 loss team from the East in the SEC CG. Do you think the 2nd place team in the West should be left out of consideration for the NC game even if they beat the SEC champ during the regular season?
Posted by Dice410
Metro NashVegas
Member since Aug 2012
1260 posts
Posted on 12/4/13 at 10:21 am to
They would have to be left out of a 4 team playoff but not an 8 team. Like this year they would probably take a 1 loss Big 12 Champ like OK St. Over Alabama going by what they have said about conference champs. Aub / Mizzou winner would be the S E C's only chance this year.
This post was edited on 12/4/13 at 10:23 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter