Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Talent vs Experience - which is more important?

Posted on 12/3/13 at 12:08 pm
Posted by HottyToddy7
Member since Sep 2010
13962 posts
Posted on 12/3/13 at 12:08 pm
Would you rather field a team for 1 year of less talented players with 2 years of experience or more talented players with no experience? Which team would get more wins?
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/3/13 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Would you rather field a team for 1 year of less talented players with 2 years of experience or more talented players with no experience?
How much more talented?
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9437 posts
Posted on 12/3/13 at 12:18 pm to
I'll take both, but they aren't anything without discipline.
Posted by MIZ_COU
I'm right here
Member since Oct 2013
13771 posts
Posted on 12/3/13 at 12:20 pm to
Well it depends. Are we talking about football?
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 12/3/13 at 12:29 pm to
More talent is the obvious answer. They might not win for you their first season in the system but they will reach the same experience level. There's a reason why top 5 recruiting programs like Alabama win NC's.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter