Started By
Message
locked post

Alabama 70% Chance to Win, Auburn 30% Chance.

Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:32 pm
Posted by Bulskinator
Member since Sep 2011
181 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:32 pm
Brian Fremeau and Bill Connelly, originators of college football’s two statistical approaches -- FEI and S&P+, respectively -- began to create a combined ranking that would serve as 'official' college football rankings. F/+

The Fremeau Efficiency Index (FEI) considers each of the nearly 20,000 possessions every season in major college football. All drives are filtered to eliminate first-half clock-kills and end-of-game garbage drives and scores. A scoring rate analysis of the remaining possessions then determines the baseline possession efficiency expectations against which each team is measured. A team is rewarded for playing well against good teams, win or lose, and is punished more severely for playing poorly against bad teams than it is rewarded for playing well against bad teams.

The S&P+ Ratings are a college football ratings system derived from both play-by-play and drive data from all 800+ of a season's FBS college football games (and 140,000+ plays).

The F/+ is an index of both the FEI and S&P Ratings.


Here are some of the key advanced rankings for the Iron Bowl.

When Alabama has the ball

F/+: Bama O 12th, Auburn D 22nd
• Standard Downs S&P+: Bama O 11th, Auburn D 51st
• Passing Downs S&P+: Auburn D 12th, Bama O 14th
Rushing S&P+: Bama O 12th, Auburn D 39th
Passing S&P+: Bama O 17th, Auburn D 34th
• Adj. Line Yards: Bama O 12th, Auburn D 19th
• Adj. Sack Rate: Bama O 19th, Auburn D 33rd
First Down Rate: Bama O 12th, Auburn D 95th
• Explosive Drives: Bama O second, Auburn D 84th
Methodical Drives: Bama O 39th, Auburn D 94th

When Auburn has the ball

F/+: Bama D second, Auburn O 17th
• Standard Downs S&P+: Bama D fourth, Auburn O 30th

• Passing Downs S&P+: Bama D ninth, Auburn O 10th
Rushing S&P+: Bama D second, Auburn O 11th
Passing S&P+: Bama D 11th, Auburn O 27th
• Adj. Line Yards: Bama D second, Auburn O fifth
• Adj. Sack Rate: Auburn O 90th, Bama D 113th
• First Down Rate: Bama D 19th, Auburn O 23rd
• Explosive Drives: Auburn O eighth, Bama D 11th
Methodical Drives: Bama D second, Auburn O 59th


From this data, which is pretty significant statistically and used by many analysts to predict odds and outcomes, these are my thoughts:

When it comes to overall D vs O, Alabama has a clear edge as you can see in the bold above. Auburn will have a difficult time moving the ball on Alabama, and will have moderate difficulty stopping the Bama offense, especially the run. This will open up the secondary and expect the TEs and deep balls from Bama to start humming


• Bama’s first down rate is far superior than Auburn’s, and looks as though methodical drives combined with ability for first downs is going to edge out time for Auburn and give Alabama a distinct advantage for possession. So, if AU is to fall behind, it’s going to be very difficult for them to come back. They’ve come back to win against many teams this season, but by no more than 8 points or so (except for TAMU whose defense is a sieve)

• Additionally, Auburn will HAVE to throw the ball, they will put up rushing numbers, but nothing over the 200 mark. The rest of Auburn's offense is going to have to go to the air. This will lead to mistakes and a loss of possession time for the Tigers.

•A very good regression shows Bama as a 70% winner of the game within an 85% accuracy of the regression. This makes Auburn very unlikely to win this game. LINK / If you view this link and expected wins after week 13, you can see Auburn has lesser odds than Bama.LINK

*Auburn is allowing 250/yds/gm passing and 150/yds/gm rushing against opponents on defense. *Alabama, if they rush for 140 yards, haven't lost a game (this statistic goes back several seasons).

•Alabama is a 70% probable winner of this game within an 85% accuracy model, the F/+ statistics above also indicate this to be true.

TL; DR (too long; didn’t read)= Bama is a pretty strong favorite in this game and is likely to win on both sides of the ball and time of possession, they are likely to win by more than the spread. This is probable, and not guaranteed (70% chance).
This post was edited on 11/27/13 at 12:38 pm
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:33 pm to
Holy wall of text, Batman.
Posted by thatdude1985
Oxford, AL
Member since Oct 2011
27038 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:33 pm to
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
64911 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:34 pm to
Must be a 70% chance of rain, then.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18287 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:34 pm to
Do you have the Fremeau/Connelly prediction of the Auburn-Georgia game?
Posted by GooseSix
Member since Jun 2012
19490 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:34 pm to
Posted by Bulskinator
Member since Sep 2011
181 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:35 pm to
I dont', but that would be a good comparison. I think we'd also need to look at their overall prediction rate, although, they more or less offer these rankings by variables instead of outright predictions.
Posted by NBamaAlum
Soul Patrolville
Member since Jan 2009
27604 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Do you have the Fremeau/Connelly prediction of the Auburn-Georgia game?



They said there was a 99% chance that two DB's from UGA would fail to bat down a 75 yrd hail mary and it would be juggled, but caught, for a TD.
Posted by crankbait
Member since Feb 2008
11623 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Must be a 70% chance of rain, then.


Just for a half though, amirite?
Posted by atlau
Member since Oct 2012
5264 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:38 pm to
THANKS!!! I was going to the game, but after seeing that no reason to waste my time. I'll sell my ticket and stay home and watch a marathon of Sister Wives on TLC.
Posted by Bulskinator
Member since Sep 2011
181 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:39 pm to
hahah...hilarious. It's just a regression, not an outright pick. That 30% chance is still hanging out there.

Enjoy sister wives though, I know you love his style.
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22288 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:40 pm to
Did not read.
Posted by War Eagle_313
Member since Nov 2013
27 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:43 pm to
Might as well not play the games then. Let's just do regressions for the seasons from now on.
This post was edited on 11/27/13 at 12:44 pm
Posted by TKLSUMD
Young Harris Georgia
Member since Oct 2011
1842 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:45 pm to
Bama 90% chance of winning IMO.
Posted by JordonfortheJ
Bavaria-Germany
Member since Mar 2012
14547 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Alabama 700% Chance to Win.
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:47 pm to
Posted by Legend13
Driving a titleist
Member since Nov 2011
4079 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:48 pm to

Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:54 pm to
Surprised to see Alabama fans happy about this. 30% is a pretty decent chance all things considered.
Posted by Bulskinator
Member since Sep 2011
181 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 12:56 pm to
I would agree with that, additionally the confidence interval is 85%, so you can make some adjustments for that in your interpretation.
Posted by yellowhammer2098
New Orleans, LA
Member since Mar 2013
3850 posts
Posted on 11/27/13 at 1:02 pm to
Ran a regression of my own actually that predicted the outcome to be 38-20 Bama. Way less variables and variables that were highly insignificant. Get a better grade if I'm close though.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter