Started By
Message
We Own the Tie Breaker Over SC, Right?
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:01 pm
For now at least.... the shitty thing is they're actually ranked and we aren't.
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:04 pm to JoLeUGA
Yes but mizzou owns it over us so that doesn't come into play unless they lose 2 more
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:08 pm to tween the hedges
quote:
Yes but mizzou owns it over us so that doesn't come into play unless they lose 2 more
Which isn't unlikely. Here's to hoping they pull a WVU and drop their last 5 games
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:09 pm to tween the hedges
I can see them splitting one between Tennessee and Ole Miss and losing to Texas A&M.
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:11 pm to JoLeUGA
Well I think they'll lose to Texas A&M.
They have 3 more games and without knowing who they play I think they're currently way above their level so they could lose.
They have 3 more games and without knowing who they play I think they're currently way above their level so they could lose.
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:25 pm to tween the hedges
This is fricking pathetic. We're hoping for another team to lose 2 games so what?......we can edge them out on the SEC east? Maybe we can get an SEC East fell bassackwards into almost winning something title.
We just need to try and get a win over FL and AU to at least not be totally emarassed by this shitstorm of a season.
We just need to try and get a win over FL and AU to at least not be totally emarassed by this shitstorm of a season.
Posted on 10/26/13 at 10:26 pm to SquatchDawg
I don't care at this point. Yeah, it'd be nice if we "fell into" the East, but I'm not expecting it.
I'm just in a good mood because those boring punks lost tonight.
I'm just in a good mood because those boring punks lost tonight.
Posted on 10/26/13 at 11:00 pm to tween the hedges
quote:
Yes but mizzou owns it over us so that doesn't come into play unless they lose 2 more
Which could happen. Missouri still has to play 4 SEC games because there first 4 games were all non-conference games. They could easily slip up against Tennessee, Ole Miss and A&M. If they just lose one more SEC game and UGA and SC both win out, we could end up with a 3 way tie.
Posted on 10/26/13 at 11:21 pm to davesdawgs
quote:
we could end up with a 3 way tie.
Missouri would go, because they lost a game out of the division...
Posted on 10/27/13 at 1:42 am to JoLeUGA
Yes.
This is how it works out.
If MIzzou wins out, they win the SECe, but they have to play Tenn, Ole Miss and aTm.
For USC to win the SECe, Mizz has to lose 1 more game. If Mizz, UGA and USC all have 2 SEC losses, the higher ranked team goes to the SECCG.
For UGA to win the SECe, Mizz has to lose 2 more SEC games, or Mizz loses 1 more and UGA has to shoot up the rankings a lot and win out (Cocks and UF have to lose games)
For UF to win the SECe, Mizz has to lose 2 more SEC Games, or UF has to shoot up the rankings a lot and win out (Cocks and UGA have to lose games.)
The loser of the UF/UGA game will pretty much be eliminated from contention for the SECe bid to the SECCG.
This is how it works out.
If MIzzou wins out, they win the SECe, but they have to play Tenn, Ole Miss and aTm.
For USC to win the SECe, Mizz has to lose 1 more game. If Mizz, UGA and USC all have 2 SEC losses, the higher ranked team goes to the SECCG.
For UGA to win the SECe, Mizz has to lose 2 more SEC games, or Mizz loses 1 more and UGA has to shoot up the rankings a lot and win out (Cocks and UF have to lose games)
For UF to win the SECe, Mizz has to lose 2 more SEC Games, or UF has to shoot up the rankings a lot and win out (Cocks and UGA have to lose games.)
The loser of the UF/UGA game will pretty much be eliminated from contention for the SECe bid to the SECCG.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 7:23 am
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:15 am to JoLeUGA
quote:
For now at least.... the shitty thing is they're actually ranked and we aren't.
South Carolina wins the SEC east....we are going to get bitch slapped when we play Auburn....
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:36 am to CockInYourEar
Sorry but not exactly right.
If MIZZ loses one in the east. Then. Your right. If all win out Highest bcs goes. Which I think is interesting considering it could come down to USC-CLEMSON to determine rankings between UGA-USC
If MIZZ loses only one but in the west they go.
If they lose 2 , UGA goes.
This is assuming all other games are wins of course.
If MIZZ loses one in the east. Then. Your right. If all win out Highest bcs goes. Which I think is interesting considering it could come down to USC-CLEMSON to determine rankings between UGA-USC
If MIZZ loses only one but in the west they go.
If they lose 2 , UGA goes.
This is assuming all other games are wins of course.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:47 am to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
If MIZZ loses only one but in the west they go.
division records don't count, I'm a million percent sure about this.
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:33 am to CockInYourEar
"IF" UGA, SC & Mizzou all finish 6-2 in conference & 1-1 against each other...
It would come down to the final tiebreaker - the final BCS standings. But it's not necessarily the highest-ranked team that wins the tiebreaker.
"IF" the highest and second-highest ranked teams are within five places of each other in the standings, it will be the head-to-head winner of the top two teams going to the title game.
So if Mizzou loses( have to lose to UK or UT... a loss to maTm won't hurt them) to go 6-2 & were to fall below UGA & SC who need to win out (including the GT & CU games for BCS ranking purposes)in the BCS standings... IF SC & UGA were within 5 spots of each other, UGA would go due to H to H vs SC....
ETA... for this to happen Mizzou's loss would have to be to Tenn. or UK.... Not ATM...
It would come down to the final tiebreaker - the final BCS standings. But it's not necessarily the highest-ranked team that wins the tiebreaker.
"IF" the highest and second-highest ranked teams are within five places of each other in the standings, it will be the head-to-head winner of the top two teams going to the title game.
So if Mizzou loses( have to lose to UK or UT... a loss to maTm won't hurt them) to go 6-2 & were to fall below UGA & SC who need to win out (including the GT & CU games for BCS ranking purposes)in the BCS standings... IF SC & UGA were within 5 spots of each other, UGA would go due to H to H vs SC....
ETA... for this to happen Mizzou's loss would have to be to Tenn. or UK.... Not ATM...
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 8:43 am
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:35 am to CockInYourEar
Posted on 10/27/13 at 8:38 am to 3rddownonthe8
So in my scenario above Mizzou's 2nd loss would have to be to UT or UK?? (since UGA & SCe losses were both division losses)...
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News