Started By
Message
Can I get everyone to state their opinion on a few matters, por favor?
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:09 pm
This query is two-fold.
1) Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling and/or ref stuff like holding?
2) Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
'ppreciate your concern about my questions.
1) Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling and/or ref stuff like holding?
2) Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
'ppreciate your concern about my questions.
36
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:09 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
) Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling and/or ref stuff like holding?
I'll defer to the LSU fans on that matter
quote:
2) Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
No
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:10 pm to NBamaAlum
1. Yes
2. No
2. No
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:10 pm to NBamaAlum
1. Yes
2. Meh
2. Meh
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:10 pm to TXGunslinger10
Yes then
No.
No.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:10 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
1) Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling and/or ref stuff like holding?
2) Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
1-A No
1-B Yes, particularly holding.
2) Yes.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:11 pm to NBamaAlum
No
Shouldn't
Shouldn't
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:11 pm to NBamaAlum
1) No, its just feels like it.
2) No
2) No
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:11 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
1) Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling and/or ref stuff like holding?
No. Saban teams are legitimately disciplined. If holding (etc) "can be called on every play" then we don't violate the CALLABLE holds... until this year lol.
quote:
2) Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
Way too early to tell. Depends on who you ask.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:11 pm to deeprig9
1-Yes
2- probably not
2- probably not
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:11 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
1) Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling and/or ref stuff like holding?
No
quote:
2) Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
Yes
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:12 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
1) Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling and/or ref stuff like holding?
with the bridge schedule yes, normally, no.
quote:
2) Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
no
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:12 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Does UA get favorable treatment in relation to scheduling
No
quote:
ref stuff like holding?
Holding maybe, but that's not really because it's UA. Saban's teams in general have a reputation for being disciplined, and that plays in their favor sometimes. You know, sort of like how reputation affects perception of everybody in real life.
quote:
Will UA be punished for the situation spoken of in the recent Yahoo article?
In all likelihood, no
This post was edited on 9/12/13 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:13 pm to Crowknowsbest
Definitely not.
Probably not.
Probably not.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:14 pm to Daigeaux
quote:
with the bridge schedule yes, normally, no.
Yep, this has been proven.
No, to answer the OPs 2nd question.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:14 pm to NBamaAlum
Yes
No and hope not
No and hope not
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:15 pm to SpartyGator
quote:
I'll defer to the LSU fans on that matter
Taking cues from your administration to back LSU, then when it is time to put your neck out there, walk it back?
So transparent.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:16 pm to NBamaAlum
1a. No
1b. yes but not as bad as people make it out to be
2. No
1b. yes but not as bad as people make it out to be
2. No
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:16 pm to BayouBlitz
1)YES, not even close but you played fair for next year
2)Probably not, but who knows with those idiots.
2)Probably not, but who knows with those idiots.
Posted on 9/12/13 at 3:16 pm to NBamaAlum
1) Scheduling: No, unless you're a tinfoil-hat-wearing LSU fan.
Holding? That's not holding. That's tackling. That's different.
2) Depends on what you mean by "punished". From what has been published so far I can see Alabama maybe forfeiting games, which is a meaningless penalty for me. Looks like the school is in the clear, and I can't see this resulting in probation or scholarship reductions.
Holding? That's not holding. That's tackling. That's different.
2) Depends on what you mean by "punished". From what has been published so far I can see Alabama maybe forfeiting games, which is a meaningless penalty for me. Looks like the school is in the clear, and I can't see this resulting in probation or scholarship reductions.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News