I have a Question regarding investigation process

I'm not 100% sure so don't take this as gospel but

Right now all it is, is a story. I believe the NCAA has to get all it's info itself if they want to make a ruling. See the Miami case. They got lazy and didnt go through all the hoops they needed to(the NCAA).

I think the administration has known for some time and has probably already starts their investigation. Fluke has already been questioned by them. I'd bet my bank account though that all this is enough to get the NCAA involved in an investigation.

If the administration finds enough they'll most likely impose self punishment. You pretty much have to if there's something there. If that's the case the NCAA will go through their findings and determine if the punishment is enough. Maybe nothing is found by the administration. The NCAA will still probably make a ruling.

I think the NCAA pokes it's head in the door at the least.

UA released a statement yesterday saying they were aware of the story and started looking into it before the story was ppublished .
CNS also mentioned that during is presser too.

quote:

---

I think the administration has known for some time and has probably already starts their investigation. Fluke has already been questioned by them. I'd bet my bank account though that all this is enough to get the NCAA involved in an investigation.

---

How do you know this?

I think it really will comes down to Davis and what he is willing to share. Every comment by the agents was in response to questions regarding information Yahoo already had. They defended their role. Meaning Yahoo had all this info and the only way Yahoo could get any of these records is from Davis. He is the smoking gun in my opinion and will determine how far this will go.

I am guessing I am the only one who has zero fricks to give about this story of the week. This is not going to go anywhere because the guy connected wasn't a known booster for the program but a rogue individual trying to profit for his own well being instead of the programs. Where this differs in the USC deal is that the NCAA was looking for any way to hammer that program because of the way Pete Carrol ran his program. His program was completely open to the Hollywood public, which was done so for recruiting purposes and of course these Hollywood personas gave money to the student athletes. The major differences are as follows, this was an on going process, the university did nothing to solve it(and really promoted it), this was something that was beneficial to the football program/ university not just an individual. Basically its akin to getting Al Capone on tax evasion bc you couldn't get him on the hard evidence for his actual crimes.