Started By
Message
locked post

Field Design

Posted on 9/8/13 at 2:22 am
Posted by Shockley03
Knoxville, TN
Member since Oct 2012
703 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 2:22 am
Did anyone else like the fact we didn't put those horrendous new alternate logos on the field today?

Also what does everyone think about the new endzone font?
Posted by S1C EM
Athens, GA
Member since Nov 2007
11585 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 6:45 am to
Nothing wrong with the new logos. Everyone just hates change and didn't want them getting rid of the "old Dawg", which they never intended to do. I suggest you start getting used to it because it's going to show up a lot more as we move forward.

Didn't even notice the font.
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 9:17 am to
I miss the old block letters we used to do like in 2009 but otherwise it isn't bad. Still not used to the jerseys though
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59524 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 9:22 am to
I wish we still had the Power G at the goal line. Didn't the sidelines inside the RZ switch to red from white, a few years ago?
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 9:27 am to
I miss those too. And I'm not sure
Posted by Boston Dawg
Hunger Games Failure
Member since Sep 2012
150 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 9:55 am to
Power G was back at goal line
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14158 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 9:58 am to
That was a sweet play...Murray turned that loose right after Gurley made his cut. Damn I'm happy for that kid today.
Posted by DaveyDownerDawg
2021 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
Member since Sep 2012
6619 posts
Posted on 9/8/13 at 10:00 am to
More proof that AM is more effective out of the pocket lol.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter