Started By
Message
Who Would You Rather Take on your D-Line This Year? Cody or Pollack?
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:21 am
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:21 am
Terrence Cody was a force to be reckoned with. David Pollack was too. They were both better than Clowney or Fairley, that's for damn sure.
So, who do you want on your DL this year?
So, who do you want on your DL this year?
16
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:22 am to deeprig9
Cody better than Clowney or Fairley? clearly this is a joke.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:24 am to Jockamo
I'm not joking. Explain your feelings.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:27 am to deeprig9
quote:
Terrence Cody was a force to be reckoned with. David Pollack was too. They were both better than Clowney or Fairley, that's for damn sure.
Seriously. Quit huffing your keyboard cleaner. You're losing brain cells at an alarming rate, Rig.
And to answer your question...even though I will never get over what he did to us I would take Pollack.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:28 am to deeprig9
Nice bait
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:30 am to deeprig9
Fairley was better than Cody.
Pollack and Clowney are about equal.
So thread is kind of blah but I'd take Cody. He'd be good for our 3-4 scheme. We need a monster NT to absorb blocks.
Pollack and Clowney are about equal.
So thread is kind of blah but I'd take Cody. He'd be good for our 3-4 scheme. We need a monster NT to absorb blocks.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:31 am to deeprig9
so is this the response thread to diddy's thread?
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:33 am to deeprig9
Terrance Cody over Nick Fairley?
Only in a hotdog eating contest.
Only in a hotdog eating contest.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:33 am to deeprig9
Again, DIAF and take the person who said Pollack = Clowney with you 
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:34 am to deeprig9
Pollack but only if it was a time travel option where we could get the 2004 version, b/c our LB's are young. We could put him at Mike and he would be an upgrade.
Did Pollack ever have a pro career, I can't remember him doing anything?
Did Pollack ever have a pro career, I can't remember him doing anything?
This post was edited on 8/3/13 at 12:56 am
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:34 am to 08Gatorbait
Cody is not in the same league as pollack, clowney, and fairley.
The latter trio all have made numerous athletic bone crushing, and jaw dropping plays with athleticism. Hated both fairley and pollack but they were beasts.
Cody was a fat frick gap filler. okay he blocked a couple crucial field goals. And really he's good at what he does. But do NOT mention him in the same breath as the others. Give me fricking Marcell Dareus over the mountain.
The latter trio all have made numerous athletic bone crushing, and jaw dropping plays with athleticism. Hated both fairley and pollack but they were beasts.
Cody was a fat frick gap filler. okay he blocked a couple crucial field goals. And really he's good at what he does. But do NOT mention him in the same breath as the others. Give me fricking Marcell Dareus over the mountain.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:51 am to deeprig9
quote:
Cody or Pollack?
quote:
They were both better than Clowney or Fairley, that's for damn sure.
quote:
deeprig9
Should have been prepared for the hilarity before I opened the thread.
In all seriousness Clowney and Fairley were/are far better than Cody and Pollack.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 12:52 am to Jockamo
True.
Alabama's LBs are the playmakers, obviously, and most of the defensive linemen are just there to occupy space. Nothing wrong with it, just a different style.
Alabama's LBs are the playmakers, obviously, and most of the defensive linemen are just there to occupy space. Nothing wrong with it, just a different style.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 1:01 am to deeprig9
quote:
Terrence Cody was a force to be reckoned with. David Pollack was too. They were both better than Clowney or Fairley, that's for damn sure.
So, who do you want on your DL this year?
On our line this year? Neither.
Cody is a 3-4 NG, wouldn't work in our 4-2-5 system.
Sutton opposite Clowney should be at least as good as Pollack... he might have a shot at second or third string DE (maybe).
Posted on 8/3/13 at 1:04 am to deeprig9
Posted on 8/3/13 at 1:10 am to Loathor
You would take a 3 year backup over a 3 time All-American?
Hm. Cool.
Hm. Cool.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 1:10 am to Loathor
quote:
Sutton opposite Clowney should be at least as good as Pollack.
Wowzahs
Posted on 8/3/13 at 1:11 am to Loathor
And i took up for you in the other thread Loathor, cmon!
Posted on 8/3/13 at 1:15 am to I-H8-BAMA
Clowney is the most overhyped D-Lineman I've ever seen. No way in hell he's better than Pollack even at Pollack's average production. Fairley is by default better than Cody because Cody was not meant to do the things Fairley did.
I stand by the fact that Clowney, albeit a fantastic player, is not GOAT status or in a class all by himself until he proves as such this year. I wanna see the guy get at least twenty sacks and a significant amount of TFLs before I believe that he's lived up to the outrageous amount of unjustified hype.
I stand by the fact that Clowney, albeit a fantastic player, is not GOAT status or in a class all by himself until he proves as such this year. I wanna see the guy get at least twenty sacks and a significant amount of TFLs before I believe that he's lived up to the outrageous amount of unjustified hype.
Posted on 8/3/13 at 1:27 am to FourThreeForty
Fourthreeforty, that hit he had on the Michigan rb was the perfect storm for people to over-hype him. Great player, just not the caliber everybody thinks he is at this very moment.... yet...
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News