Started By
Message
Mizzo Would You Want to be in the West?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:10 am
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:10 am
Asking for a friend who thinks Mizzou in the West and maybe Auburn in the East? Would make everybody happy
8
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:11 am to undecided
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:12 am to undecided
If they thought their record was bad in the East have fun in the West 
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:18 am to undecided
It'll sound corny, but really don't care...just glad to be in the SEC. Stick us wherever. Geographically, yes, the west makes more sense. Is that done without upsetting rivalries? Dunno. In the east we'd get thumped regularly by UF, UGA and SC. In the west we'd get thumped regularly by LSU, Bama, A&M and whoever happens to be strong that year.
ETA - Thought I had Bama in there as well. No slight intended.
ETA - Thought I had Bama in there as well. No slight intended.
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 9:24 am
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:19 am to reedus23
A truthful Mizzou fan
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:19 am to Hogwall Jackson
quote:
If they thought their record was bad in the East have fun in the West
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:20 am to undecided
quote:
Mizzou in the West and maybe Auburn in the East? Would make everybody happy
This is perfect and should happen. It fixes everything. I would hate to lose the Auburn game annually but if this is whats needed to fix a broken system I'm all for it.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:27 am to CBandits82
quote:
Mizzou in the West and maybe Auburn in the East? Would make everybody happy
this +1000.... it only makes f'n sense!
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:34 am to Luke
AU has wanted to be in the east forever. More traditional rivals.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:36 am to CBandits82
It's not perfect and it doesn't fix everything.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:37 am to Hogwall Jackson
I know you're flaming, but they've been heavily recruiting TX, and doing a decent job of it, for a while.
Them being in the West and having more exposure to TX and the surrounding states probably would be best for them, strictly speaking long term.
Them being in the West and having more exposure to TX and the surrounding states probably would be best for them, strictly speaking long term.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:39 am to Patton
Right, UA would have two rivals in east.
Now Mizzou/Kentucky switch with AU/UA would be .....perrrrrfect.
Now Mizzou/Kentucky switch with AU/UA would be .....perrrrrfect.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:42 am to Hogwall Jackson
quote:
If they thought their record was bad in the East have fun in the West
SEC East teams' combined '12 SEC record: 28-28
SEC West teams' combined '12 SEC record: 28-28
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:43 am to Patton
quote:
It's not perfect and it doesn't fix everything.
sell me on why its not perfect.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:43 am to undecided
Who is everybody?
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:44 am to Patton
quote:
It's not perfect and it doesn't fix everything.
aww, poor Bama doesn't want be forced to choose between Auburn and Tennessee?
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 9:45 am
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:45 am to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Now Mizzou/Kentucky switch with AU/UA would be .....perrrrrfect.
You would have to keep Bama in the west balance wise. Again, moving Auburn and Mizzou is perfect. All rivalries are intact and we can get rid of permanent opponents.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:48 am to CBandits82
AU/UA, AU/UGA and UA/UT won't be done away with.
Probably get some flack for this but one is not like the other two. Stopping UA/UA and AU/UGA would be a sin. The IB is not as traditional as it's made out to be and the BOT way back in the day that thought it a bad idea to have this annually may have been on to something.
flame away.
Probably get some flack for this but one is not like the other two. Stopping UA/UA and AU/UGA would be a sin. The IB is not as traditional as it's made out to be and the BOT way back in the day that thought it a bad idea to have this annually may have been on to something.
flame away.
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 9:50 am
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:53 am to CBandits82
quote:
All rivalries are intact
all rivalries are not intact.
Posted on 5/24/13 at 9:55 am to Patton
I've never given it much thought. What's lost by moving Auburn to the east? Bama loses either the Tennessee or Auburn rivalry game? Anything else?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News