Started By
Message
NFL Draft Efficiency by colleges (top 20) - LSU #1, Bama unranked.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:14 pm
20
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:15 pm to The Mick
So what you're saying is...AL does more with less?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:15 pm to The Mick
:bamasessed:
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:16 pm to The Mick
Louisville #1
Ga Tech #2
Guess the SEC should shut down.
Ga Tech #2
Guess the SEC should shut down.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:16 pm to USMC Gators
Did you read the article Asshat? Just the opposite.....READ!!!!
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:17 pm to The Mick
Louisville #1, LSU 7.
will give a 6/10 though.
will give a 6/10 though.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:17 pm to The Mick
Alright! Now you guys have something to hang your hat on....
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:17 pm to The Mick
1970-2007...
Nice data set.
Nice data set.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:17 pm to USMC Gators
quote:No dummie. The article suggests that Bama does less with more. ROI = return on investment.
So what you're saying is...AL does more with less?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:18 pm to The Mick
Bama...the standard by which LSU measures itself.
Elite programs dont constantly meaaure themselves against other programs.
Start acting like you've been there.
Elite programs dont constantly meaaure themselves against other programs.
Start acting like you've been there.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:19 pm to The Mick
quote:
No dummie. The article suggests that Bama does less with more. ROI = return on investment.
I'm still searching to see how data from 1970-2007 reflects on the record number of NFL draft picks Alabama has sent from 2008-present.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:19 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
quote:LSU is 1st. Sorry your team isnt ranked.
Louisville #1, LSU 7.
will give a 6/10 though.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:20 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
I'm still searching to see how data from 1970-2007 reflects on the record number of NFL draft picks Alabama has sent from 2008-present.
I didnt write the article, just sharing. 
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:21 pm to The Mick
You did actually read the method explanation, didn't you?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:21 pm to The Mick
Love how insecure LSU fans have become.
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:21 pm to The Mick
But you don't have any issue using irrelevant data to spark an argument about present conditions, right?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:21 pm to The Mick
quote:
Missouri 61 +4.7 21 +3.9% 20
Mizzou makes the top 20
VAE = Value Above Expectations
ROI = Return on investment
Meanwhile he has formulas that take the subjectivity out. Going from 1970 was a mistake. A lot of irrelevant to current when you go back that far.
This post was edited on 4/16/13 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:22 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:Where have I used irrelevant data to spark an argument about present conditions?
But you don't have any issue using irrelevant data to spark an argument about present conditions, right?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:22 pm to The Mick
quote:
I didnt write the article, just sharing.
If I found an article that found a correlation between Neapolitan ice cream sales and Clemson victories, would you want me to post it for you to read?
Posted on 4/16/13 at 1:24 pm to The Mick
quote:
Where have I used irrelevant data to spark an argument about present conditions?
Don't act dense. It is obvious why you chose the headline. But you didn't even stop to think about the data set used and how it correlates to the argument you're suggesting.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News