Started By
Message

re: Chances for major violations against LSU, Bama and Auburn from SWATS debacle

Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:17 am to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37553 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:17 am to
quote:

As usual Bama will get away with it while LSU and Auburn get hammered


Is that how it goes? I've never noticed that before. Could you help me please, by citing an example or two?
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:20 am to
Posted by thefloydian
Member since Dec 2012
4771 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:21 am to
He's mad.
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9110 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 8:52 am to
Considering I've never met you and I never refer to you specifically in my posts I'm not sure where you get that you have a "history" with me. You do seem to take my comments which aren't directed at anyone specifically personally for some reason though.
Posted by tampajoe
Tampa
Member since Dec 2011
268 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 10:56 am to
the floydian:

Thought this was banned by the NCAA though - and not the bracelets and other stuff.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 10:58 am
Posted by Omahareb
Member since Jan 2013
182 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:01 pm to
Food for thought? Has anyone else looked at the S.W.A.T.S. website? I just noticed that a former ole miss player and current ole miss coach has made an endorsement of S.W.A.T.S. May need to add them to the list, just saying.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48866 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:13 pm to
didn't AU already get looked at for the bracelets? i dont think we ingested anything
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:24 pm to
You forgot to add Ole Miss and UGA to the death march.

It's a good thing they announced it cures ALS too.
This post was edited on 2/3/13 at 9:28 pm
Posted by plazadweller
South Georgia
Member since Jul 2011
11434 posts
Posted on 2/3/13 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

The idea that Alabama somehow gets away with anything NCAA violation related is so stupid that it's not even funny. The crying from Auburn fans about getting special treatment from the NCAA is so ridiculous and hypocritical considering Alabama has been on probation numerous times the last 18 years and got busted for frickin free textbooks. Nebraska did the exact same thing Alabama did and got nothing and didn't even have to vacate any football wins. Meanwhile, the NCAA and SEC loophole Auburn out of trouble with Cam Newton not even missing a game. 4 Auburn players openly admit taking illegal benefits from Auburn boosters yet nothing happens. Who is getting away with cheating again?


Just fricking WOW...Do you have nightmares about Cam every single night?
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:03 am to
quote:

Al.com article
The above article points out some rule infractions that could have the NCAA knocking on LSU, Bama and Auburn's door. I don't know whether or not to believe what the two owners are saying. They seem to contradict themselves from interview to interview.



The problem is that story is written by Kevin Scarbinsky, who would have a hard time making it as a Wal-Mart greeter should he ever lose his al.com job.

He only survives by alternately rustling the jimmies of Auburn and Alabama fans. He does seriously bad work.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:06 am to
quote:

LSU
0%
quote:

Auburn
0%
quote:

Bama
99% - they may be able to buy their way out though.
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18149 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:11 am to
Auburn Connection... We used the Chips which are not banned... Now some of the other stuff is banned, but Auburn did not use that...

They are called “chips” — tiny holographic patches worn on the skin at Chinese acupuncture points that, according to the company that supplied them to Etheridge, Sports With Alternatives To Steroids (S.W.A.T.S.), help the body maintain and replenish its energy supply.

If S.W.A.T.S. sounds familiar to you, it should. The company’s founder, Mitch Ross, has been in the news recently for another of his controversial products — The Ultimate Spray. It’s a supplement supposedly made from deer velvet antler which is touted to contain a growth hormone banned by every major professional sports league. Ross had ties to several coaches in the NFL and many players, but the league recently informed them they had to end their relationships with the supplement company.

But his other major product, these chips, have not been touted as containing any banned substance, and that’s what Etheridge says he used during his rehabilitation. When he was first injured, tearing ligaments in his neck and cracking his fifth vertebrae while making a tackle, doctors didn’t know if he’d ever take the field again. Eight months later, he was cleared to play. He credits the chips, in part, for his quick recovery.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38000 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:20 am to
quote:

But on your side of the ball that Cam farce was disgraceful.


Even after all this time, still so deliciously mad.
Posted by Herman Frisco
Bon Secour
Member since Sep 2008
17242 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:29 am to
The owner of the deer horn shop said he gave auburn players the chips and patches.(gave).
He also said that one of the barners did spray his product under both arms. Does that count?
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:32 am to
quote:

The owner of the deer horn shop said he gave auburn players the chips and patches.(gave).


Did he say something else? something you might be leaving out here? something like "gave" could mean something like "gave" it to them after someone "purchased" them. I know its hard to understand but "gave" doesnt always mean to give something for free

Nice to see you in an Auburn thread again
Posted by Herman Frisco
Bon Secour
Member since Sep 2008
17242 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:40 am to
Just trying to do my part.
Ps, gave means gave.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Ps, gave means gave
yes, but you are presenting it as gave meaning gave for free, like I asked, are you leaving something out here? I know you ATPB'ers are simple folk and have a hard time seeing a broad scope when you have your mind narrowed
Posted by Herman Frisco
Bon Secour
Member since Sep 2008
17242 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:50 am to
What do you not understand about gave? Gave means gave. He gave them his product.
Now do you see what I am saying?
Posted by marshallwayne22
tennessee
Member since Dec 2012
3 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:50 am to
LSU and Abarn should be use to getting hammered on the field by Bama, hence nothing new.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 2/4/13 at 8:51 am to
quote:

What do you not understand about gave? Gave means gave. He gave them his product. Now do you see what I am saying?


did he give it to them for free?
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter