Started By
Message
2011 Bama or 95 Nebraksa
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:24 pm
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:24 pm
Which do you think is better? Clearly Bama fans think 2011 Bama is better.
30
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:25 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Frick the nubs. 2011 Bama for me
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:25 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Is this the Nebraska with Tommy Frazier?
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:25 pm to Rickdaddy4188
95 Nebraksa would beat 2011 Bama by 3 TDs
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:26 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Which do you think is better? Clearly Bama fans think 2011 Bama is better.
What are you smoking? And why does this need another thread?
You said they would rush for 500 yards on the 2011 defense. Why don't you make the thread about THAT?
I think it would be a pretty good matchup.
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:26 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Is this the Nebraska with Tommy Frazier?
Yes. Gumps in another thread saying Bama would beat them.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:27 pm to Grievous Angel
quote:
You said they would rush for 500 yards on the 2011 defense. Why don't you make the thread about THAT?
If Ga southern can run for 290 , I'm ire the greatest option team of all time could get 200 more.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:28 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Nobody thinks any of the Alabama title teams are better than '95 Nebraska. However, it's ridiculous if you don't think they can't compete with the 1994 and 1997 Nebraska teams. They were far from being heads and shoulders above the competition. Heck, most people thought Michigan was the better team in 1997 until the bowl season.
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 11:29 pm
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:28 pm to Rickdaddy4188
95 Nebraska and i don't even think it would be close.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:29 pm to Rickdaddy4188
01 Miami
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:29 pm to Rickdaddy4188
If you could translate Nebraska's relative dominance over CFB in 1995 to 2011, then it would be a hell of a game.
Nebraska's linemen were considerably smaller than those of today.
Nebraska's linemen were considerably smaller than those of today.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:30 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Nebraska teams played a vastly easier schedule. I would wager big bucks that if you substituted our players into the nebraska schedule, we'd beat the teams they played in a very similar fashion. idk.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:30 pm to Rickdaddy4188
the GOAT for $200
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:30 pm to Rickdaddy4188
This would be the thread:
LINK
quote:
Yes. Gumps in another thread saying Bama would beat them.
And one would be hard pressed to say the conversation is about Bama beating Nebraska, but more about your assertion they'd roll up 500 rushing yards on bama.
One would NOT be hard pressed to say you've entered "making shite up" territory.
quote:
95 Nebraska would wreck every bcs winner. THEY AVERAGED 350 YARDS A GAME RUSHING. they would put up 500 yard rushing against Bama's 2011 defense , which I think is the goat.
Brought to you by rickdaddy, fond of calling everyone else ignorant.
Interesting strategy, starting a completely new thread, and changing the context entirely.
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:31 pm to Latarian
now there you can have an actual debate
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:31 pm to HempHead
quote:
If you could translate Nebraska's relative dominance over CFB in 1995 to 2011, then it would be a hell of a game.
Nebraska's linemen were considerably smaller than those of today.
Grant Wistrom actually said that in an article recently when he was asked to compare the two teams. He basically said that today's college players are much bigger, faster, and stronger than college players were in the mid '90s.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:32 pm to m2pro
If Auburn of 2012 played a bunch of literal highschool teams... what do you think the outcome would be?
It's all about the competition.
I do NOT think the Nebraska players were physically more dominant OR that better coached than our teams.
It's all about the competition.
I do NOT think the Nebraska players were physically more dominant OR that better coached than our teams.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:32 pm to m2pro
Nebraska played 4 Top 10 teams that year, closest game was 23 points.
nice try.
nice try.
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:33 pm to Rickdaddy4188
basically, i think our teams would beat those nebraska teams more often than not... but i wouldn't be shocked either way.
what i can tell everyone here for sure, is that the games would -certainly- be competitive. and i for one, think we'd beat them more often than they'd beat us in a series.
what i can tell everyone here for sure, is that the games would -certainly- be competitive. and i for one, think we'd beat them more often than they'd beat us in a series.
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News