Started By
Message
Bowls Based on BCS Rankings
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:39 pm
What if bowls were based on common sense and rankings? What would your bowl matchups look like? Based on the Final BCS rankings.
1 ND vs 2 Bama BCS Title
3 Florida vs 4 Oregon Sugar
5 KSU vs 7 UGA Rose
6 Stanford vs 8 LSU Orange
9 TAMU Vs South Carolina 10 Fiesta
This scenario would generate a hell of a lot more ticket revenue and the tv ratings would be great.
What would your matchups be?
1 ND vs 2 Bama BCS Title
3 Florida vs 4 Oregon Sugar
5 KSU vs 7 UGA Rose
6 Stanford vs 8 LSU Orange
9 TAMU Vs South Carolina 10 Fiesta
This scenario would generate a hell of a lot more ticket revenue and the tv ratings would be great.
What would your matchups be?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:41 pm to geauxranger54
Cotton Bowl tickets are expensive and selling well.
I think you can donate cans of food to get chick fil a bowl tickets.
I think you can donate cans of food to get chick fil a bowl tickets.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:41 pm to geauxranger54
6 out of 10 bowl opponents from the SEC?
that would go over real well
that would go over real well
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:41 pm to geauxranger54
I'd like to see LSU and UGA play each other
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:41 pm to geauxranger54
Jesus those would be some entertaining games
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:42 pm to geauxranger54
I think the bowls are fine the way they are, teams should be rewarded for winning their conferences, not riding the coat tails of other conference members up the BCS rankings.
Also it is nice to see other teams like NIU recognized for outstanding years and justly rewarded for bowls they have earned.
If you are not happy with the bowl your team earned, your team should perform better during the season.
Also it is nice to see other teams like NIU recognized for outstanding years and justly rewarded for bowls they have earned.
If you are not happy with the bowl your team earned, your team should perform better during the season.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:44 pm to geauxranger54
Agreed. Those are much, much better matchups.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:50 pm to geauxranger54
quote:
1 ND vs 2 Bama BCS Title
3 Florida vs 4 Oregon Sugar -tossup
5 KSU vs 7 UGA Rose
6 Stanford vs 8 LSU Orange
9 TAMU Vs South Carolina 10 Fiesta
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:50 pm to Matheson
quote:
6 out of 10 bowl opponents from the SEC?
While this it true the rankings are what they are. These matchups would make an awesome bowl season.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:52 pm to TwelfthMan
quote:
Cotton Bowl tickets are expensive and selling well.
I think you can donate cans of food to get chick fil a bowl tickets.
Way to focus on the actual content of the OP, asshat.
Hope y'all suck less than your last few visits to Jerry World.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:54 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
I think the bowls are fine the way they are, teams should be rewarded for winning their conferences, not riding the coat tails of other conference members up the BCS rankings.
I'm fine with that.
So we agree that Arkansas had no business playing in the Sugar Bowl on NYD 2011.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:55 pm to geauxranger54
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:58 pm to geauxranger54
it would be excellent to watch and attend. I think it might lead to more split titles under the current format.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 4:59 pm to JDM1992
quote:
JDM1992
You'd put 3 SEC teams in the BCS but not have UGA? Why?
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:00 pm to JDM1992
Technically, UGA should be in before LSU. But, whatever.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:01 pm to WG_Dawg
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:03 pm to JDM1992
Fun fact: UGA and OU have never played each other.
A UGA/OU Sugar Bowl would sell out super fast.
A UGA/OU Sugar Bowl would sell out super fast.
Posted on 12/27/12 at 5:04 pm to wadewilson
quote:
UGA should be in before LSU. But, whatever
quote:
LSU Fan
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News