Started By
Message
Division record should determine division championships
Posted on 12/25/12 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 12/25/12 at 1:57 pm
If the SEC wanted to be fair and continue the "so called" traditional games,they could make one simple rule change. Division record determines division championships instead of overall SEC record.
But if that happened, certain teams such as Georgia and Bama would not have found the road to the SEC Championship game so easy this year.
Georgia missed the four strongest teams in the SEC West: Bama, LSU, Texas A&M, and Mississippi St., while Bama missed the only strong teams in the SEC East: Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina.
When will the SEC administrators make the rules fair for all schools?
Why do the powers that be in the SEC think this is fair? Are they bias towards certain schools?
The answer has to be yes; they are bias, and they want to keep the rules unfair. Fairness is obviously not a high priority in the SEC's front office, which is located in Birmingham, Alabama.
But if that happened, certain teams such as Georgia and Bama would not have found the road to the SEC Championship game so easy this year.
Georgia missed the four strongest teams in the SEC West: Bama, LSU, Texas A&M, and Mississippi St., while Bama missed the only strong teams in the SEC East: Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina.
When will the SEC administrators make the rules fair for all schools?
Why do the powers that be in the SEC think this is fair? Are they bias towards certain schools?
The answer has to be yes; they are bias, and they want to keep the rules unfair. Fairness is obviously not a high priority in the SEC's front office, which is located in Birmingham, Alabama.
28
Posted on 12/25/12 at 1:58 pm to TigerDice
If they did this there would have been some really goofy results, like 1993 LSU at 5-6 going to the SECCG.
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:00 pm to TigerDice
Go enjoy your family. It is Christmas man. 
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:02 pm to TigerDice
I can agree with this.. to an extent.
It seems that divisional record is completely arbitrary.
But OP, you WILL catch shite from Bama fans calling you butthurt for crying about having to play Florida every year.
ETA: Exhibit A: the response after this post
It seems that divisional record is completely arbitrary.
But OP, you WILL catch shite from Bama fans calling you butthurt for crying about having to play Florida every year.
ETA: Exhibit A: the response after this post
This post was edited on 12/25/12 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:03 pm to TigerDice
quote:
The answer has to be yes; they are bias, and they want to keep the rules unfair. Fairness is obviously not a high priority in the SEC's front office, which is located in Birmingham, Alabama.
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:05 pm to TigerDice
Merry Christmas
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:05 pm to TigerDice
And here we go
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:06 pm to TigerDice
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:08 pm to TigerDice
UGA still would've won the East this year so go suck your dad's cock some more.
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:09 pm to TigerDice
REC says Merry Christmas.
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:13 pm to TigerDice
But then why play any cross division games? You could schedule pansy teams from the pac12 or big12 or fat slow teams from the big10.
Oh this is LSU fan crying about playing Florida. A team Bama has blown out the last three times they played.
Maybe LSU is simply no good?
And you sure do cry a lot.
Oh this is LSU fan crying about playing Florida. A team Bama has blown out the last three times they played.
Maybe LSU is simply no good?
And you sure do cry a lot.Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:15 pm to PepaSpray
quote:
But then why play any cross division games?
Tie-breakers? Just a thought.
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:15 pm to paul02085
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:18 pm to TigerDice
LSU fans will bitch about Alabama even on Christmas
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:27 pm to TigerDice
quote:This is incorrect.
Georgia missed the four strongest teams in the SEC West: Bama, LSU, Texas A&M, and Mississippi St., while Bama missed the only strong teams in the SEC East: Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina.
Ole Miss >>> than MS State. And Georgia blew them out.
LSU barely survived against them. Here's you a beer.
now 
in it.Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:37 pm to PepaSpray
Gotta love the transitive property..
So, educate me; with your logic, how do you explain the following scenario?
LSU barely squeaks by Auburn
Auburn gets blown out by both A&M and Bama
LSU beats A&M but loses a close one to Bama
Bama loses to A&M
So, educate me; with your logic, how do you explain the following scenario?
LSU barely squeaks by Auburn
Auburn gets blown out by both A&M and Bama
LSU beats A&M but loses a close one to Bama
Bama loses to A&M
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:39 pm to TigerDice
Cross-division games should only be used as tie-breakers.
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:42 pm to brewhan davey
quote:I know I know. It was mostly just to say I like Ole Miss over MS State. It wasn't an actual analysis.
So, educate me; with your logic, how do you explain the following scenario?
But I do like Cross Divisional games counting. Even when it works against Bama.
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:42 pm to brewhan davey
Actually, I would be in favor of this tweak. Determine the SEC West champs with the following criteria, in order:
1. Divisional record
2. Overall conference record
3. Head to head
...
It makes sense. Why have an unequal conference schedule determining who represents your division, when it should first break down by how well you did against other teams in your own division?
1. Divisional record
2. Overall conference record
3. Head to head
...
It makes sense. Why have an unequal conference schedule determining who represents your division, when it should first break down by how well you did against other teams in your own division?
Posted on 12/25/12 at 2:43 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:
1. Divisional record
2. Overall conference record
3. Head to head
I like it.. except H2H should be #1. But otherwise, the other factors work for me.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News