Started By
Message
locked post

Added historical significance for older Bama fans

Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:19 am
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:19 am
Obviously two of the best, if not the two best, programs in the history of college football playing for a national title is a big deal. However, I was wondering if there was additional significance for the Bama fans who are old enough to remember the 70's.

I consider Bryant to be the best coach in college football history, but he seemed to struggle with Notre Dame. I don't think he ever beat them, and I'm pretty sure Notre Dame beat Alabama multiple times with the national title on the line. I was wondering if that made this matchup a little more special for the older Bama fans on here. Does this championship game possibly mean a little more to you than others in the past?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:30 am to
Notre Dame cost us the AP national championship in '73 and a share of the national championship in '74. Because of that, we lost the benefit of the doubt when we were title contenders in '75 and '77.

Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:31 am to
quote:

but he seemed to struggle with Notre Dame.


No seeming to it. Coach Parsegian had his number. ND and Texas were his krypton. I want Bama to do unspeakable things to their team Jan 7th.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:32 am to
Also, don't forget the AP gifted ND with a National Title in '66 when they intentionally played for a tie, despite the fact that Bama finished as the only undefeated, untied team.
Posted by Eyothrie
Mobile, AL
Member since Jul 2010
965 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:36 am to
Crimson and Clover reborn:)
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Also, don't forget the AP gifted ND with a National Title in '66 when they intentionally played for a tie, despite the fact that Bama finished as the only undefeated, untied team.


How did the AP award titles then(66'), Before or After Bowls

Posted by GarlandTiger
Garland, Tx.
Member since Dec 2007
356 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Because of that, we lost the benefit of the doubt when we were title contenders in '75 and '77.


It could be the same situation with further reaching consequences for the whole SEC. If BAMA were to lose, it will put a big dent in the SEC national perception.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:44 am to
quote:

How did the AP award titles then(66'), Before or After Bowls

Before, but irrelevant.

Bama destroyed Nebraska in the Sugar Bowl. Notre Dame's Tie-One-for-the-Gipper was the second to last game of the regular season, and they didn't go to a bowl game.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 11:46 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:45 am to
quote:

How did the AP award titles then(66'), Before or After Bowls


1934-1964: Before the bowl games
1965: After the bowl games
1966: Before the bowl games
1967-present: After the bowl games

Posted by rolltide1283
Pinson
Member since Feb 2007
3362 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:46 am to
quote:

How did the AP award titles then(66'), Before or After Bowls


If I'm not mistaken, they awarded titles before bowls but ND tied MSU in the regular season and we finished unbeaten and untied. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think I remember correctly.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:47 am to
They swapped how they gave it the previous 2 yrs, because of Bama. '66 was more a political statement on civil rights issues in the South, than it was about the best team.

Notre Dame only played in one bowl game the years they won the AP's title though. They only played in one bowl game prior to 1970. The 1925 Rose Bowl. They have a 15-16 overall Bowl record. Five of their AP titles, came without them playing in a Bowl game.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 11:49 am
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:49 am to
Bama won the AP in '64 and '65. No team has ever won 3 straight AP titles.

And they didn't want Bama to be the first. What's tragic is the 1966 team was more deserving than '64 or '65.
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 11:50 am
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:50 am to
Well Saban took care of Bama's Texas problem. I expect him to do the same with ND.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:51 am to
We have beaten them once, in the 80s with Cornelius Bennett. Ray Perkins was coach.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 11:52 am to
quote:

And they didn't want Bama to be the first. What's tragic is the 1966 team was more deserving than '64 or '65.


Indeed. 1965 was blind luck. We were 8-1-1 and #4 going into the bowls. #1 and #2 lost in their bowl games and we ended up beating #3 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:07 pm to
It should be made clear that Notre Dame actually went for the tie. They got the ball will 1:10 left and sat on it intentionally. Michigan State, who had been trying to score (unsuccessfully) the previous possession was furious and bewildered.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:14 pm to
This game is means a great deal.



...as much as a game can mean
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 12:15 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64930 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

It should be made clear that Notre Dame actually went for the tie. They got the ball will 1:10 left and sat on it intentionally. Michigan State, who had been trying to score (unsuccessfully) the previous possession was furious and bewildered.


Here's the clip from that part of the game:

Final Drive
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:25 pm to
Notre Dame had 4 timeouts left. Yes, four. You got that many back then. They used none. They ran the ball.
Posted by tidalmouse
Whatsamotta U.
Member since Jan 2009
30706 posts
Posted on 12/13/12 at 12:30 pm to
They played back to back in ,I believe 73' and 74' at the Sugar then Orange.Bama went in both games ranked #1 and had basically been declared NCs already.That's what they did back then.Notre Dame under Ara Parsigian(sp) won 13-12,and 24-23.The Bear never beat Notre Dame and the Irish hold 6-1 record against Bama.Alabama did not beat Notre dame til Cornelius Bennett knocked Steve Burline(sp) cookoo.

eta:For some reason I thought Bama had beaten them twice.

quote:

11/14/1987 Alabama 6 - Notre Dame 37 10/4/1986 Alabama 28 - Notre Dame 10 11/15/1980 Alabama 0 - Notre Dame 7 11/13/1976 Alabama 18 - Notre Dame 21 1/1/1975 (Orange Bowl) Alabama 11 - Notre Dame 13 12/31/1973 (Sugar Bowl) Alabama 23 - Notre Dame 2
This post was edited on 12/13/12 at 12:37 pm
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter