Started By
Message
locked post

Do some of you actually think Stanford deserves a shot over the SEC champ?

Posted on 11/30/12 at 9:54 pm
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75831 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 9:54 pm
I've seen that thrown around by a few morons this week. fricking UCLA is wrecking their shite in the PAC-12 Championship Game. They definitely deserve to be in the NC discussion.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28586 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 9:55 pm to
I have kept watching... just TRYING to figure out either A: how over rated Oregon is or B: just how in the hell Standford beat them. can't decide.

oh, and i lean towards both A and B.
This post was edited on 11/30/12 at 9:56 pm
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79892 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 9:58 pm to
Both UCLA and Stanford are better than Oregon. The reason? Stanford has the #1 defense in the conference, UCLA? #2.
Posted by Crimson06
Tours
Member since Jan 2012
571 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:01 pm to
Well its always hard to beat the same team twice, especially in a 6 day span. And to be fair to UCLA, they are a MUCH improved team from last year.

That said, i agree- stanford isnt at the level of competing for a NC yet, but theyre QB has been pretty solid since taking over
Posted by UFownstSECsince1950
Member since Dec 2009
32600 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:12 pm to
Stanford should easily go over Bama and/or Georgia. Much better resume
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28586 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Stanford should easily go over Bama and/or Georgia. Much better resume


the point is to get the best two teams in the big game... no matter what. do you REALLY think Stanford is a better team than Bama?
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
75831 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:18 pm to
Yeah losing to Washington is such a good loss, especially since Washington lost to fricking 2-10 Washington State. GTFO with that shite.
Posted by reel_gator8
Seminole,Fl
Member since May 2012
11060 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:21 pm to
UCLA RB was averaging 11 yds a pop at end of third qt and already had 170 yds rushing...Holy Shizzola, the PAC 12, 11, 13 or whatever they are. suck.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Do some of you actually think Stanford deserves a shot over the SEC champ?


Yes.

Because I hate Saban that much.



















Just keeding.

Posted by loopback
Member since Jul 2011
4844 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:22 pm to
And LSU beat Washington 45-3
Posted by 615tider
sidewalk in TN
Member since Oct 2012
3348 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

m2pro


Nice one.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28586 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:25 pm to
truth is truth! :)
Posted by SanDiegeauxSteve
The Greater San Diego Area
Member since Oct 2012
1751 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:25 pm to
What game are you watching where UCLA is "wrecking their shite?" Check the scoreboard. Retarded thread.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28586 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:28 pm to
retarded thread because of one statement?

the subject title poses a fair question.... there's no damn way they deserve to go over the SEC champ, lol.
Posted by UFownstSECsince1950
Member since Dec 2009
32600 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:30 pm to
So by your logic of "biased, opinionated, subjective rankings", do you honestly think Alabama/Georgia is better than UF??

Using your logic, UF should be in the title game
Posted by SanDiegeauxSteve
The Greater San Diego Area
Member since Oct 2012
1751 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:30 pm to
I agree. That is why I see no need for a thread even discussing such absurdity. But no way is FUCLA tearing anybody's shite up. Stanford does nothing but beat their arse all the time.
Posted by JombieZombie
Member since Nov 2009
7687 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:30 pm to
Probably not, but it's dumb for most people here to not give non-SEC teams any credit. Stanford is a hard nosed team that would challenge anyone from the SEC.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28586 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:31 pm to
quote:


Using your logic, UF should be in the title game


Using MY logic, Florida should NOT be in the title game. YOU were the one supposing that the schedule W/L column alone was reason for Stanford to be more deserving.

I noticed how you didn't answer my question.

Likewise, do you really think Florida is better than Alabama?
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28586 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:32 pm to
10-4
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
28586 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

Probably not, but it's dumb for most people here to not give non-SEC teams any credit. Stanford is a hard nosed team that would challenge anyone from the SEC.


i agree with that too. but, i seriously doubt Stanford would even challenge Alabama or LSU, and would probably get beaten 70% of the time by UF, S.Car, and UGA.

a lot of people get to believing their team is better than X team because they beat them one time.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter