Started By
Message
Why wouldn't Oregon jump bama to #2 with Stanford win
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:12 pm
Oregon's only loss would been to a much better team than bama's loss? Wasn't that bama's whole point of jumping Okie St to #2 last year?
34
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:13 pm to kappadelttau
S
E
C
E
C
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:13 pm to kappadelttau
For the simple fact that the BCS and the network are in a fap frenzy at the idea of a Bama vs. ND final.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:14 pm to kappadelttau
Bama would still have 12 wins....Oregon would only have 11.
Last year was different, OKST didn't have a CC title game so both teams had 11 wins
Last year was different, OKST didn't have a CC title game so both teams had 11 wins
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:14 pm to kappadelttau
Cuz they're not playing Stanford? 
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:14 pm to kappadelttau
MSB mmkay
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:14 pm to kappadelttau
Because no one in the Harris Poll or Coaches Poll thinks Oregon is better than Bama
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:14 pm to kappadelttau
Like Florida, that loss cost them the division and the opportunity to win the conference.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:15 pm to kappadelttau
Are you talking about next year's schedule?
Derp!
Derp!
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:17 pm to kappadelttau
How is losing to a top 10 team with 2 losses at home a much better loss than losing to a top 10 team with 2 losses at home?
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:17 pm to kappadelttau
quote:
Why wouldn't Oregon jump bama to #2 with Stanford win
Don't you mean UCLA?
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:17 pm to kappadelttau
quote:
Oregon's only loss would been to a much better team than bama's loss?
11-2 Stanford vs 10-2 A&M is exactly the same as 12-0 LSU vs 6-6 Iowa State
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:17 pm to dawgdayafternoon
bama's loss cost them the division last year
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:18 pm to kappadelttau
When does this mystical game you speak of take place?
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:18 pm to kappadelttau
Lulz
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:20 pm to kappadelttau
This post is more stupid than Larry, Mo and Curley put together.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:20 pm to kappadelttau
quote:
Oregon's only loss would been to a much better team than bama's loss?
Good point. The massive difference between this year's Top 10 Stanford and Texas A&M teams perfectly mirrors the difference between 13-0 LSU and 6-6 Iowa St last year.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:22 pm to kappadelttau
Because they would have no wins over top 10 teams.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:22 pm to wm72
The difference is that Alabama's loss didn't take them out of contention for their conference title, Oregon's did.
You are not likely to see a team that didn't win it's conference overtake a team with a better or similar record that won its conference after what happened last year.
You are not likely to see a team that didn't win it's conference overtake a team with a better or similar record that won its conference after what happened last year.
Posted on 11/26/12 at 5:23 pm to sarc
OP is actually suggesting that since 1 year ago an 11-1 team went over an 11-1 team......then this year a 11-1 team should go over a 12-1 team.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News