Started By
Message
Strength of Schedule
Posted on 11/25/12 at 12:48 pm
Posted on 11/25/12 at 12:48 pm
Is there anywhere to find an official strength of schedule rankings for college football?
5
Posted on 11/25/12 at 12:49 pm to obsessedgator
Google it.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 12:49 pm to obsessedgator
Posted on 11/25/12 at 12:51 pm to obsessedgator
My sheets have:
1. Missouri
2. Kansas
3. Texas A&M
4. Iowa State
5. Florida
6. Tennessee
7. California
8. Washington
9. West Virginia
10. Kentucky
1. Missouri
2. Kansas
3. Texas A&M
4. Iowa State
5. Florida
6. Tennessee
7. California
8. Washington
9. West Virginia
10. Kentucky
Posted on 11/25/12 at 12:52 pm to obsessedgator
Posted on 11/25/12 at 12:55 pm to USMC Gators
Posted on 11/25/12 at 1:10 pm to bigDgator
Some of you are way, way too consumed by strength of schedule issues. If it is that important, then why not just schedule four top 5 non-conference opponents, beat 2 of them, finish 8-4, and declare yourselves a top 5 team?
Posted on 11/25/12 at 1:13 pm to bigDgator
Well we finished 1st/2nd in something at least...
Posted on 11/25/12 at 1:23 pm to bigDgator
Damn bigD that avi and sig makes me feel a sense of pride to see. Did u change for FSU. Congrats on that game btw
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:02 pm to King Crimson
quote:
Some of you are way, way too consumed by strength of schedule issues. If it is that important, then why not just schedule four top 5 non-conference opponents, beat 2 of them, finish 8-4, and declare yourselves a top 5 team?
How else should you seperate teams with the same record that didn't play head to head? your logic is flawed in that you not only have to play the best schedule, but you have to win the games.
bdv1974 - No way I kept it. A bet is a bet.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:09 pm to obsessedgator
Bama 79... 
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:14 pm to Jaketigger
quote:
Bama 79
That's basing strength of schedule on nothing more than the wins and losses of opponents which is a pretty crappy way to calculate it most people would agree. Using that method, a good cupcake opponent helps SOS much more than an average SEC opponent.
Most SOS calculations actually take into account the quality of opponents and not just their records. Sagarin has Bama at #39 I believe.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:18 pm to sarc
quote:
Sagarin has Bama at #39 I believe.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:25 pm to Jaketigger
I know, right? #39 is awesome if you are on the billboard charts.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:28 pm to bigDgator
quote:
I know, right? #39 is awesome if you are on the billboard charts.
And #2 in the BCS is awesome if you want to play for a national championship.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:39 pm to sarc
It certainly is. It also has nothing to do with the argument.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:42 pm to bigDgator
What arguement? Florida wins the SOS title, congrats.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:51 pm to sarc
Print the T's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:55 pm to sarc
Not teaching remedial message board today. BTW, Fla wins the SOS title most years.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 2:56 pm to bigDgator
quote:
How else should you seperate teams with the same record that didn't play head to head? your logic is flawed
What you're saying is that by virtue of playing a more difficult schedule Team A is better than Team B. It proves nothing of the sort.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News