Started By
Message
locked post

Move Over Ags; Forget 1939

Posted on 11/14/12 at 6:29 am
Posted by Black Bengal
Pearland, TX
Member since Jan 2005
204 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 6:29 am



Ags, you should be aware that USC has claimed the 1939 football national championship. Several years ago they added the year 1939 to their list of national championships painted in big numbers on the outside of their football stadium. Apparently, someone working at their school discovered that a couple of obscure polls actually voted the Trojans #1 in 1939 (see links below). USC's practice is to claim itself champions in all years that it was voted #1 in any final poll, no matter how minor or obscure the poll. Using that approach LSU could claim 7 football championships & TAMU could claim 5; however, there were only 3 championship flags in Tiger Stadium the last time I visited.

LINK

LINK

Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 6:30 am to
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 6:39 am to
They started claiming that as a title during the Carroll years, and it's on the same level as Bama's 41 and UT's 67.

Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29177 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 7:03 am to
Don't care. People can claim all the national titles they want. It makes no difference to me.
Posted by JDM1992
In your head
Member since Dec 2011
15141 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 7:05 am to
This post was edited on 2/17/13 at 12:00 am
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5910 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 7:13 am to
I watched every game that USC and A&M played in 39. We were better.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54595 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:35 am to
The problem was Tennessee in the Rose Bowl is 0-2 and Bama is 4-1-1 during a similar time frame. Tennessee, Georgia Tech, and Tulane were all undefeated in conference play that season. Sadly back then the SEC did not have a CCG to determine a winner so we will never know.

In those early polls the MNC was determined prior to the bowl games so more than a few schools would have to give up their MNC claims if U$C policy on the 39' game was accepted as gospel. The bigger question was if that 39' Trojan team used under inflated balls to beat the Vols that day?
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 8:51 am to
That is what is great about the whole playoff thing hitting as we are getting good.
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 9:30 am to
quote:

I watched every game that USC and A&M played in 39. We were better.


Underrated post.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20824 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 10:09 am to
Tennessee got screwed...
Posted by juff
Member since Oct 2012
1241 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 10:12 am to
quote:

I watched every game that USC and A&M played in 39. We were better.


I only saw a couple of those games, but I agree. aTm looked like a much stronger team.
Posted by John Maplethorpe
Graubünden, Switzerland
Member since Jun 2010
889 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 10:12 am to
That '39 Cornell team was the GOAT. If you took Bama's defense and A&M's offense in 2012 and played them, Cornell would win by 50.
Posted by ChrisTAMU
Member since Aug 2011
811 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 10:13 am to
tl;dr
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 10:14 am to
Mizzou - 1960 National Champions in Football
Posted by Black Bengal
Pearland, TX
Member since Jan 2005
204 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Don't care. People can claim all the national titles they want. It makes no difference to me.


Just don't understand this attitude. Another school is parading your only national championship as their own? I thought apathetic Ags were few & far between...
Posted by CavalryAg07
ChiTown
Member since Jul 2009
2772 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 12:40 pm to
this is not new. USC has done this for as long as I can remember. That is why I wasn't so upset when we claimed 1919 and 1921.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 12:43 pm to
How can we stop them? Sue? Burn down the stadium?

Nope, the response is to do the same thing.

Hence our national championship count tripling overnight.
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

USC's practice is to claim itself champions in all years that it was voted #1 in any final poll, no matter how minor or obscure the poll.


sounds familiar
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29177 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Just don't understand this attitude. Another school is parading your only national championship as their own? I thought apathetic Ags were few & far between...


It's the poll era. If you look up AP National Champs in 1939... Only one team is listed. If you care about a title from back then, you probably look up how they were awarded. It is what it is.
Posted by ZouKeeper314
Missouri
Member since Jun 2012
2185 posts
Posted on 11/14/12 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Mizzou - 1960 National Champions in Football


2007 National Champions!
LINK
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter