Started By
Message
re: Mark Ingram could've passed as Kimbo Slice last night...
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:40 pm to sunnydaze
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:40 pm to sunnydaze
quote:I've been unbiased in this discussion thus far, and this just isn't true.
Ridley > Trent
DWI
Richardson is better than Tate, Ridley, and Ingram. No doubt about it.
1
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:42 pm to TT9
quote:
The Saints are were RB's go to die.
Or to revive their careers, see Darren Sproles.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:44 pm to Maximus
Heisman season vs LSU: Ingram had 22 carries for 144 yards. Made the LSU defense look silly in the 2nd half. Your sorry asses helped him get that 1st round pick. 
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:44 pm to Swagga
quote:He was awesome at SD, FWIW...
Or to revive their careers, see Darren Sproles.
I would know. He burned the Broncos a ton while he was there.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:45 pm to BhamDore
quote:
The saints are just a really shitty organization that don't run the ball effectively. Ingram was a dumb pick for them.
quote:
When he gets on another team he will have success. Saints have not had a solid running game since Breeze has been throwing for 4000 and 5000 yards.
You don't watch much NFL, do you?
Saints were 6th in the league in overall rushing last season, ahead of a couple of teams that start guys named Matt Forte and Ray Rice. Even with those numbers, Ingram was 3rd on his own team, 474 yards on 122 carries. By comparison, Sproles had 603 yards on 87 carries, and Thomas had 562 yards on 110 carries. There were 5 players on the Saints roster that rushed for more ypc than Ingram, including Drew Brees.
quote:
Ingram would gave to play for a team like Houston, Kansas City, or Washington to be successful.
He would be, at best, 3rd string for the Texans, behind Tate and Foster. He would not start over Jamaal Charles or Alfred Morris, and I'm not sure he would get more carries then Peyton Hillis.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:46 pm to TTsTowel
You're right, I just meant coming to NOLA seemed to give him a little boost. Maybe it was trying to prove something to San diego
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:49 pm to Swagga
quote:I fully agree. The Saints use him perfectly.
You're right, I just meant coming to NOLA seemed to give him a little boost. Maybe it was trying to prove something to San diego
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:51 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
I've been unbiased in this discussion thus far, and this just isn't true.
Richardson is better than Tate, Ridley, and Ingram. No doubt about it.
Ridley is better than Trent. 716 yards with a 4.8 ypc > 470 yards with a 3.7 ypc. And Ridley is getting all those touches with better competition for his spot in that backfield.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 1:58 pm to wadewilson
Yep that sums it up....no name guy > Richardson.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:00 pm to wadewilson
On a much more talented and much better coached team.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:00 pm to thatdude1985
Ridley was about 40% of LSU's offense in 2010.
Richardson was supposed to be one of the greatest RBs to come out of college in the last few years, and he's barely cracking the top 20 in rushing yards.
Richardson was supposed to be one of the greatest RBs to come out of college in the last few years, and he's barely cracking the top 20 in rushing yards.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:02 pm to TTsTowel
Another poor trolling job from TTs 
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:03 pm to cajunbama
quote:
On a much more talented and much better coached team.
MJD lead the league in rushing last season, playing for Jacksonville.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:03 pm to wadewilson
quote:
Ridley is better than Trent. 716 yards with a 4.8 ypc > 470 yards with a 3.7 ypc. And Ridley is getting all those touches with better competition for his spot in that backfield.
this is ridiculous and pathetic. Ridley has Tom Brady and Richardson has Weedon.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:09 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
this is ridiculous and pathetic. Ridley has Tom Brady and Richardson has Weedon.
A poor QB isn't going to hinder the play of an elite RB. I'm just making a comparison. I like Richardson, I think he was just a little overvalued. Ridley was a little undervalued.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:09 pm to Big Bam
quote:
Another poor trolling job from TTs
How so? I'm not the one that brought up anything about him in the NFL.
This post was edited on 11/4/12 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 11/4/12 at 2:29 pm to SECSolomonGrundy
quote:
this is ridiculous and pathetic. Ridley has Tom Brady and Richardson has Weedon.
This is just retarded. So I guess Richardson was better in college solely because he had McCarron and Ridley had JJ
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News