Started By
Message
3
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:25 pm to Bama54
quote:
^^^This^^^
Yeah, the team that consistently has one of the best offenses in the NFL doesn't know how to use a RB
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:26 pm to Bama54
what team would best highlight the skills of a small, fat, slow, weak RB who gets tripped up if he is touched at all?
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:27 pm to bmy
quote:
if the Saints could get Trent
I'd be happy as a lark.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:27 pm to Maximus
ROFL so much butthurt in this thread. LOVE it.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:28 pm to Maximus
quote:
what team would best highlight the skills of a small, fat, slow, weak RB who gets tripped up if he is touched at all?
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:28 pm to Bama54
The Saints know how to use Pierre Thomas and Darren Sproles, but not Ingram?
okay.
okay.Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:29 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
ROFL so much butthurt in this thread. LOVE it.
Well, two of us here would prefer Trent to Mark.
For a first rounder, Mark sucks as a pro. Sproles and Thomas are better. If you can't see this, then you don't watch the Saints and/or understand pro football.
This post was edited on 11/4/12 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:29 pm to Robot Santa
his shirt should say I am a huge bust
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:30 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:Yeah, not to mention Chris Ivory looked much better than Mark Ingram.
The Saints know how to use Pierre Thomas and Darren Sproles, but not Ingram?
okay.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:30 pm to cyogi
Part of the bitterness is that we need defensive talent on the saints.. and the morons drafted a RB in the 1st round
Grandpa Harper needs to GTFO too.
Grandpa Harper needs to GTFO too.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:30 pm to Choot em Tiger
quote:yeah Mark is bad...
Yeah the only difference really is that kimbo slice was good at what he did
Anyone would look bad in that garbage arse Saints scheme where they don't feature Mark like they should
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:31 pm to bmy
Lotta sore assholes up in here.
21-17
21-17
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:32 pm to PepaSpray
quote:Really? Why doesn't that hurt Pierre Thomas? Chris Ivory?
Anyone would look bad in that garbage arse Saints scheme where they don't feature Mark like they should
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:32 pm to PepaSpray
quote:
Anyone would look bad in that garbage arse Saints scheme where they don't feature Mark like they should
Stick to college football. Seriously.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:33 pm to cyogi
The 2012 New Orleans Saints are the 2012 Tennessee Volunteers of the NFL.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:33 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Really? Why doesn't that hurt Pierre Thomas? Chris Ivory?
Motherfrickin this TT. It's not the saints schemes fault that mark Ingram runs like a pussy when he doesn't have an Oline that creates holes wider than a fricking road.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:34 pm to trece elefantes
quote:
Lotta sore assholes up in here.
Nope. You Alabama guys are insisting he's (Mark) is not being utilized correctly. You can ask almost any Saints non-LSU fans and they agree he's not that good. Sorry you guys are sore about our opinion.
For what it's worth, I liked Harper in his prime, and would love to have Trent on the Saints squad. Hope this makes you feel better.
Edit: Oh... and I would REALLY like if the Saints could draft B. Jones.
This post was edited on 11/4/12 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:34 pm to PepaSpray
quote:
Anyone would look bad in that garbage arse Saints scheme where they don't feature Mark like they should
LOL
so much idiocy in this thread.
Posted on 11/4/12 at 12:35 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
The 2012 New Orleans Saints are the 2012 Tennessee Volunteers of the NFL.
They're more like the 2012 Auburn..
Page 2 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News