Started By
Message
BCS Rankings 2011 - Now What?
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:02 pm
We don't have to come up with "what if" secenarios if the reported new "Final Four" playoff system goes into effect. We had one last year that would make it very interesting if the rankings are weighted in favor of OOC scheduling and conference champions.
Stanford ended up #4 and Oregon #5. Oregon BEAT Stanford and won the PAC 12. It's hard to imagine that voters would put an 11-2 team in over a 11-1 from the same conference, but that just might be what happens if a lot of weight is given to OOC schedule and conference champions.
Stanford ended up #4 and Oregon #5. Oregon BEAT Stanford and won the PAC 12. It's hard to imagine that voters would put an 11-2 team in over a 11-1 from the same conference, but that just might be what happens if a lot of weight is given to OOC schedule and conference champions.
3
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:04 pm to souldog
when does it go into effect?
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:07 pm to pivey14
2014.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:09 pm to volfan30
well that's gay. I wanted to see LSU or Bama tear through the bracket.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:31 pm to souldog
Not only that, but Oregon beat @ Stanford by 23 points.
Posted on 6/20/12 at 8:37 pm to souldog
2008 (before the bowls)
1. OU (12-1, Big 12 winner)
2. UF (12-1, SEC winner)
3. Texas (11-1)
4. Bama (12-1)
5. USC (11-1, Pac 10 winner)
2007
1. Ohio St (11-1, Big 10 winner)
2. LSU (11-2, SEC winner)
3. VT (11-2, ACC winner)
4. OU (11-2, Big 12 winner)
5. UGA (10-2)
1. OU (12-1, Big 12 winner)
2. UF (12-1, SEC winner)
3. Texas (11-1)
4. Bama (12-1)
5. USC (11-1, Pac 10 winner)
2007
1. Ohio St (11-1, Big 10 winner)
2. LSU (11-2, SEC winner)
3. VT (11-2, ACC winner)
4. OU (11-2, Big 12 winner)
5. UGA (10-2)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News