Started By
Message
locked post

Tweet from Dennis Dodd (CBS) about cecil newton rule

Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:07 am
Posted by jso0003
Member since Jun 2009
5170 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:07 am
quote:

dennisdoddcbs Dennis Dodd I am told the impetus for the Cecil Newton Rule, actually started with Alabama's Andre Smith.


Wtf is he talking about?
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22030 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:08 am to


Posted by TideSatchel
Member since Nov 2011
2581 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:08 am to
Posted by jso0003
Member since Jun 2009
5170 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:09 am to
Swoopin, you in a fraternity at tech?
Posted by boddagetta
Moulton
Member since Mar 2011
9999 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:09 am to
It was a family member of Andre's that hooked him up with the agent he talked to that caused him to be inelligeble for the Sugar bowl when Bama played Utah, I think.

Just what I heard
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37246 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:09 am to
Idk WTF he's talking about. Smith's problem was speaking with / working with an agent before the Sugarbowl. I don't remember any funny business with his recruitment.
Posted by Teague
The Shoals, AL
Member since Aug 2007
21668 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:10 am to
quote:

inelligeble


I don't see how this is related to the Cam saga.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72134 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:10 am to
There's no loop hole anymore, but I think it makes things worse. Want to make a star player ineligible? Call up the school and ask for money, pretending to be his agent.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:11 am to
I'm assuming he is referring to the incident where we chose to sit out Andre for the Utah Sugar Bowl after learning some uncle was talking to agents. As far as we knew, Andre was not aware of this and wasn't even that close to the uncle, but we sat him anyways.
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18275 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Wtf is he talking about?


The reason Bama didn't let Andre play in the 2009 Sugar Bowl was the rumor that his family had talked to an agent after the regular season. The time that Utah beat Bama.

He never played another down for Alabama after that.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:12 am to
He had Lsu.
Posted by PanhandleDawg
Navarre Beach, FL
Member since Mar 2011
5441 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:12 am to
The NCAA Legislative Council on Wednesday officially passed a new rule designating any parent as an agent if he or she is found to be soliciting the services of a son or daughter to an NCAA institution, according to a report by CBSSports.com.


Cecil Newton Rule

Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:15 am to
quote:

There's no loop hole anymore, but I think it makes things worse. Want to make a star player ineligible? Call up the school and ask for money, pretending to be his agent.


I worry about this too, although it appears the rule mostly applies to parents. Closing the loophole may be worse than having the loophole. There has to be a procedure to protect an athlete's eligibility from trash family members. With the backgrounds half these players come from, they have to be more cautious of family than they do of agents.
This post was edited on 1/12/12 at 11:16 am
Posted by boddagetta
Moulton
Member since Mar 2011
9999 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:17 am to
quote:

I don't see how this is related to the Cam saga.


Both had family members shopping them around without them knowing about it.

And if that was suppossed to be a spelling BOOM, then....
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34858 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:20 am to
I hope that in future cases, they would act similarly in that: if no money every changes hand, the kid shouldn't be ineligible. If a Parent tries and gets money but is shot down, I see no reason the kid shouldn't still be able to play at that school, unless they are in on it. I don't know if that is how they will enforce this new rule, but I think that is how they should.
Posted by deaux68
Tuscaloosa
Member since Dec 2007
5283 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:22 am to
So basically Andre should've just acted like he had never heard about his family pimping him out.

I'm thinking Auburn got the better end of that deal.
Posted by diddydirtyAubie
Bozeman
Member since Dec 2010
39829 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:24 am to
quote:

So basically Andre should've just acted like he had never heard about his family pimping him out.

I'm thinking Auburn got the better end of that deal.


Cam smarter than Andre, yo.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:25 am to
quote:

I hope that in future cases, they would act similarly in that: if no money every changes hand, the kid shouldn't be ineligible. If a Parent tries and gets money but is shot down, I see no reason the kid shouldn't still be able to play at that school, unless they are in on it. I don't know if that is how they will enforce this new rule, but I think that is how they should.


I agree. The hard part is with the NCAA's limited investigation powers, it is nearly impossible for the NCAA to prove a kid knew something. Knowledge and intent are all necessary elements of nearly every criminal case, but the prosecution has the power to subpoena witnesses to build a case. The NCAA relies solely on self reporting and whistle blowers who choose to talk but do not have to.

It's easier just to say that if a parent shops you, you are ineligible, but this will definitely lead to some sad cases of star players losing their careers because of some crack addict mother or sleazy father.
Posted by bigbowe80
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
3702 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:25 am to
quote:

dennisdoddcbs Dennis Dodd I am told the impetus for the Cecil Newton Rule, actually started with Alabama's Andre Smith


If this is true then it is interesting how nothing was done to implement such a rule until 3 years later when the national outcry was very strong. That is usually what it takes however for big changes to be made in any organization or group is loud protest or outrage.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 1/12/12 at 11:28 am to
quote:

So basically Andre should've just acted like he had never heard about his family pimping him out.


Bama was not going to play him for one game regardless of what Andre knew. It was not worth the risk. We have a dominant program on reload mode every year and the only thing that can stop us is another damn NCAA investigation. We won't hesitate to sit a player if we think there could be trouble in the future.

This is where USC was stupid. Reggie Bush was awesome but they would have won just as many games if they benched him. When you are loaded with talent, you can't let one guy bring you down.
This post was edited on 1/12/12 at 11:30 am
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter