Honest Question for the SEC

There's no reason to spend money on lacrosse programs

Cause frick lacrosse. Nobody in the south really gives a shite about the sport. Hardly any high schools play it.

Is it because they know they are bad at it?

#quitters
#sorelosers

quote:

---

In the past 40 years, the ACC has more championships in Lacrosse than the SEC has in football. Maybe you should #invest.

---

In the past 5 years the SEC has brought in more revenue than those 40 years of lacrosse. Maybe you should #hireanaccountant

quote:

---

If the SEC really has the best athletes, why can't they field a decent lacrosse team?

---

All the best athletes play sports that actually have a large following and actually have a chance get them a profit. Football, baseball, and basketball are where the good athletes end up. The remainder get split among all of the other various sports.

Also, I think of lacrosse as being a slightly more refined sport and so the people who play it would probably go to more refined institutions. ACC schools are better academically than SEC schools.

Honey Badger and the entire LSU secondary would decapitate, disembowel, and shite down the throat of pussy Steele Stanwick or any "lax bro."

That's why.











In a fight, would be epic carnage for the private school lax boys.

Lacrosse isn't popular. It's gaining popularity in Louisville and Lexington, but even still only a handful of high schools have teams.

its because are football players end up in the nfl getting paid and yalls lecrosse championships carear ends when they graduate

I didn't know lacrosse actually was an ncaa sport. I thought it was only a club sport