Started By
Message
LSU up to #3 on rivals
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:42 pm
Landry and Johnson now 5 stars. 
We just passed FSU and USC.
We just passed FSU and USC.
9
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:42 pm to TxTiger82
LSU should have a very strong class this year.
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:43 pm to TxTiger82
LSU bias!!!
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:44 pm to rangers911
It is a very strong offensive class. With Mettenberger, Hilliard, Landry, Collins, et al., we'll be bringing in some guys who will be staples on our offense for years.
Defensively, the class needs to be rounded out, but I'm beginning to think we might whiff on Jernigan, Rasco, and Drew. We'll see, I guess.
Defensively, the class needs to be rounded out, but I'm beginning to think we might whiff on Jernigan, Rasco, and Drew. We'll see, I guess.
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:44 pm to bamaboy87
quote:
LSU bias!!!
Even the Bama boys running rivals couldn't deny that Jarvis Landry was the best receiver who played in either all star game.
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:44 pm to TxTiger82
Doesn't LSU always have top 5 classes?
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:45 pm to bamaboy87
Something doesn't add up here. Isn't Rivals owned by Bama guys? They are usually busy knocking our 5 stars down to 4 stars this time of year and bumping Bama commits up a star or two. I wonder what is different this year?
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:46 pm to Choctaw Hog
quote:
Doesn't LSU always have top 5 classes?
I wouldn't say always. We consistently bring in Top 5 classes, yes. Occasionally, we'll fall to Top 10 or Top 15.
The point here is that a lot of LSU fans have felt all along that Landry and Johnson were the best players at their positions in the country. Now, they have 5 stars and we are justified in that argument (even though Landry is still ranked the #4 WR).
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:47 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
I wonder what is different this year?
All-star performances. Landry and Johnson simply could not be stopped. Those performances forced Rivals' hand. I'm just glad they were able to be objective once the truth slapped them upside the face!
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:47 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
I wouldn't say always. We consistently bring in Top 5 classes, yes. Occasionally, we'll fall to Top 10 or Top 15.
I should have used frequently.
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:49 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
Isn't Rivals owned by Bama guys?
Yahoo Sports
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:49 pm to Choctaw Hog
We had top 5 classes in 2007 and 2009. Back in the Saban era, we had top classes 02-04.
In 2008 we finished Top 15, and in 2010 we finished Top 10.
In 2008 we finished Top 15, and in 2010 we finished Top 10.
Posted on 1/18/11 at 1:51 pm to TxTiger82
Posted on 1/18/11 at 2:11 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
LSU up to #3 on rivals
Congrats...
Posted on 1/18/11 at 2:14 pm to TxTiger82
I'm less concerned with LSU being number 3 and more concerned with how in the crap USC is still bringing in all this talent....
Posted on 1/18/11 at 2:16 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Even the Bama boys running rivals
Yea those fricking Bama grads out in Silicon Valley are so damn biased.
Posted on 1/18/11 at 2:22 pm to Aubie83
Posted on 1/18/11 at 2:23 pm to bamaboy87
Give Frank Wilson a raise. 
Posted on 1/18/11 at 2:35 pm to Choctaw Hog
quote:
Doesn't LSU always have top 5 classes?
Rivals past 10 rankings Choctaw.
2010-6
2009-2
2008-11
2007-4
2006-7
2005-22(Coaching transition)
2004-2
2003-1
2002-15
2001-1
7 of the past 10 in the top 7 and this year as well so I'd say your memory was pretty good.
And there were a couple more #1 classes in '04 and '09 according to the other sites.
This post was edited on 1/18/11 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 1/18/11 at 2:37 pm to TxTiger82
Not many people would argue against those two being top recruits. I was surprised they weren't from the getgo.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News