Started By
Message
Enes Kanter
Posted on 11/8/10 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 11/8/10 at 2:57 pm
So is this guy eligible or what? I still haven't found anything on whether he's going to play or not.
Just looking for the official word.
Just looking for the official word.
2
Posted on 11/8/10 at 2:58 pm to DonChulio
I don't think he should be eligible. He played for a pro basketball team, and made over 100,000 dollars.
But a lot of Kentucky fans are expecting him to be cleared mid-season.
But a lot of Kentucky fans are expecting him to be cleared mid-season.
Posted on 11/8/10 at 2:59 pm to Tennessee Jed
Yeah I think there should be no way he should be able to play. But so do they still not have an official decision on him yet?
Posted on 11/8/10 at 3:00 pm to DonChulio
He is going to be the rule for all future Euro players.
If anyone says they know, they are lying. Currently, the UK Athletic Department working with the NCAA to work through it.
IMHO, you don't allot two extensions for practice with the team to keep him off the court. I think he'll be cleared, but likely not til December'ish.
Sorry your thread will be turded on by roadgator, and other simpletons that will make the same ole same ole remarks.
If anyone says they know, they are lying. Currently, the UK Athletic Department working with the NCAA to work through it.
IMHO, you don't allot two extensions for practice with the team to keep him off the court. I think he'll be cleared, but likely not til December'ish.
Sorry your thread will be turded on by roadgator, and other simpletons that will make the same ole same ole remarks.
Posted on 11/8/10 at 3:02 pm to Tennessee Jed
quote:
I don't think he should be eligible. He played for a pro basketball team, and made over 100,000 dollars.
But a lot of Kentucky fans are expecting him to be cleared mid-season.
This. I'm sure he will be eligible in plenty of time. This is Kentucky we're talking about. The NCAA will get this over with as soon as they possibly can and count exhibition games as real games and the kid will be good to go. If this were State, there would be a two year investigation plus additional suspension time.
Posted on 11/8/10 at 3:03 pm to Wildcat
Haha well thanks...I've just been trying to look and haven't found anything official, but I guess that's because nothing is official yet.
Posted on 11/8/10 at 3:03 pm to Tds & Beer
quote:
If this were State, there would be a two year investigation plus additional suspension time.
Not for State.. This isn't the 90's
j/k
Posted on 11/8/10 at 3:05 pm to Wildcat
Nice sig quote. Might be my first one ever. Can you put in parentheses that the forced fumble was not a turnover and the part where the first guy's team won the game?
This post was edited on 11/8/10 at 3:07 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News