Started By
Message
Annual Out-of-division games
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:02 pm
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:02 pm
Georgia vs. Auburn
Alabama vs. Tennessee
LSU vs. Florida
Ole Miss vs. Vandy
Miss. St. vs. Kentucky
Arkansas vs. South Carolina
When the realignment came after South Carolina and Arkansas joined, was there some sort of bias given to powerhouse teams vs. powerhouse teams and lesser teams vs. lesser teams?
I remember back in the 70's and 80's we (UGA) always played Ole Miss. After the divisions were created, they went on the rotation schedule.
Alabama vs. Tennessee
LSU vs. Florida
Ole Miss vs. Vandy
Miss. St. vs. Kentucky
Arkansas vs. South Carolina
When the realignment came after South Carolina and Arkansas joined, was there some sort of bias given to powerhouse teams vs. powerhouse teams and lesser teams vs. lesser teams?
I remember back in the 70's and 80's we (UGA) always played Ole Miss. After the divisions were created, they went on the rotation schedule.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:05 pm to nuwaydawg
quote:
Georgia vs. Auburn
Alabama vs. Tennessee
Traditional rivalries. The rest worked out amongst themselves once these were preserved.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:05 pm to nuwaydawg
How Mississippi State got Kentucky I haven't the Slightest clue.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:08 pm to msukb79
Can't stand playing Vandy.....
We traditionally have someone important injured against them every year. Duece, TE Doug Buckles(Eli's go to guy), etc.....
We traditionally have someone important injured against them every year. Duece, TE Doug Buckles(Eli's go to guy), etc.....
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:10 pm to pankReb
yall can have uf every year and we will take vandy
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:11 pm to nuwaydawg
Shouldn't UGA-Auburn and Bammer-UT be down there with the "non-powerhouse" teams?!?
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:16 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
yall can have uf every year and we will take vandy
Fine by me. We've won 3 of 4 vs UF and lost to Vandy the last 2 years.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:17 pm to heartbreakTiger
I wish they would do away with the Permanents completely. I think they should rotate the 3 every year.
Maybe stagger it.
Season 1: Play teams A,B,C
Season 2: Play teams B,C,D
Season 3: Play teams C,D,E
Season 4: Play teams D,E,F
Season 5: Play teams E,F,A
etc. etc.
and rotate home and away with each team of course.
This way you get to play a team 2 out of every 5 years. It's pretty crappy if you have to face Tebow for 3 years while someone like Auburn(purely guessing) gets to play Kentucky for 2 or 3 years instead.
Maybe stagger it.
Season 1: Play teams A,B,C
Season 2: Play teams B,C,D
Season 3: Play teams C,D,E
Season 4: Play teams D,E,F
Season 5: Play teams E,F,A
etc. etc.
and rotate home and away with each team of course.
This way you get to play a team 2 out of every 5 years. It's pretty crappy if you have to face Tebow for 3 years while someone like Auburn(purely guessing) gets to play Kentucky for 2 or 3 years instead.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:18 pm to Billy Mays
It's lined up perfectly IMO.
The traditional top 3 SEC West teams play the traditional top 3 SEC East teams.
And the bottom SEC West teams play the bottom SEC East teams.
Combined with the fact that some very good historical rivalries exist within those slate of games; I love the way the SEC did it.
The traditional top 3 SEC West teams play the traditional top 3 SEC East teams.
And the bottom SEC West teams play the bottom SEC East teams.
Combined with the fact that some very good historical rivalries exist within those slate of games; I love the way the SEC did it.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:19 pm to pankReb
quote:
I wish they would do away with the Permanents completely. I think they should rotate the 3 every year.
Maybe stagger it.
Season 1: Play teams A,B,C
Season 2: Play teams B,C,D
Season 3: Play teams C,D,E
Season 4: Play teams D,E,F
Season 5: Play teams E,F,A
etc. etc.
and rotate home and away with each team of course.
This way you get to play a team 2 out of every 5 years. It's pretty crappy if you have to face Tebow for 3 years while someone like Auburn(purely guessing) gets to play Kentucky for 2 or 3 years instead.
I don't want to give up our series with Georgia
ETA: I'm sure all Auburn fans agree with this. And I'm also sure Alabama fans would crucify you for trying to get rid of Tennessee off of their schedule.
This post was edited on 7/7/09 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:19 pm to pankReb
quote:
I wish they would do away with the Permanents completely
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:20 pm to pankReb
i agree with you. It should rotate like that.
Yea its cool having the top div. teams play every year but I'd rather the schedule change
Yea its cool having the top div. teams play every year but I'd rather the schedule change
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:37 pm to Billy Mays
You've taken 1 of 4 from UF
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:38 pm to Ross
What happens when say, Florida(hypothetically) gets hammered with monster sanctions and becomes a 2 or 3 SEC win team every year and maybe USCe becomes the next powerhouse of the East.
LSU's yearly SOS turns to crap with Florida locked on their schedule and whoever has USCe benefits(depending on which team).
If the SEC did it my way, you would play every OO-D school twice every 5 years.
LSU's yearly SOS turns to crap with Florida locked on their schedule and whoever has USCe benefits(depending on which team).
If the SEC did it my way, you would play every OO-D school twice every 5 years.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:38 pm to Dinkle Dawg
quote:
You've taken 1 of 4 from UF
Who? Ole Miss?
We've taken 3 of 4 from UF
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:40 pm to pankReb
Your right I got my stats messed up
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:44 pm to nuwaydawg
YES. the top 6 powerhouses have a tougher schedule, yet they generally are the ones in the SECCG. IMHO, it's the best way to keep the hopes alive for the other 6 teams to make this game on occasion. it makes it possible for one of these teams to avoid playing any of the top 3 from the other division, although it usually means they only play one of them.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:45 pm to pankReb
And traditional rivalries would not be played for 3 of those 5. That is one of the thing that makes college ball. The rivalries. Don't need to screw up a good thing. Just because some schools don't have legitimate ones shouldn't cost the ones that do.
Posted on 7/7/09 at 6:47 pm to Alahunter
rotating schedule>rivalries
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News