Started By
Message

re: NOA response to be released today....

Posted on 6/16/16 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by EC Reb
Member since Sep 2012
647 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

16 scholarships over 4 years with a 3 year probation


So in year 4 we'll be playing with 69?




This post was edited on 6/16/16 at 1:05 pm
Posted by YouDontKnowBro
Los Angeles
Member since Apr 2014
1864 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 1:21 pm to
Nice.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18058 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 1:32 pm to
Each scholarship is off the board for 4 years? So does that mean that if we spanned this over 4 years it would look like:
Year 1 4
Year 2 8
year 3 12
year 4 16
year 5 12
year 6 8
year 7 4
year 8 back to 85

If so, that will suck arse. Rip the band aid off.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 2:11 pm to
Step back from the ledge...
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

So in year 4 we'll be playing with 69?



Posted by rebsfan10
Member since Dec 2013
1564 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 2:24 pm to
So I saw where Tunsil says he's coming back to Oxford for the Summer to work out. I'm probably being a tad bit optimistic, but I would think that is a good thing. I would think if there's more to those texts that Freeze would reach out to Sexton and have him advise Tunsil to stay away from Oxford. Again, this might be me stretching a bit, but I find it hard to believe if the Tunsil situation really screws us that he would want to be in Oxford and have to deal with all the negative attention.
Posted by USMReb
Member since Feb 2015
98 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 2:57 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/26/20 at 11:44 pm
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 3:17 pm to
Schollies are 1 yr commitments, so there isn't rollover.

You're essentially deducting 4 from 85 each year, for 4 yrs. Thereby, after 4 yrs, you will have been penalized 16 scholarships ("16 over 4") though you never dipped below 81 for a given year

Year 1: 85 - 4 = 81
Year 2: 85 - 4 = 81
Year 3: 85 - 4 = 81
Year 4: 85 - 4 = 81
_________________
4 yrs. (-16)

*That's a best case scenario assuming full roster with no attrition, juniors leaving early for draft, etc, but you get the point. Not a devastating penalty by any means, just gives us less room for error
This post was edited on 6/16/16 at 3:24 pm
Posted by USMReb
Member since Feb 2015
98 posts
Posted on 6/16/16 at 3:20 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/26/20 at 11:41 pm
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18058 posts
Posted on 6/17/16 at 4:20 pm to
Are you sure about that?
Posted by fillmoregandt
OTM
Member since Nov 2009
14368 posts
Posted on 6/17/16 at 5:36 pm to
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but that's typically how it's done. The penalty is taken off the 85 number, not the 25 signing class number, but the reductions are shown in the signing class unless the coaches want to start cutting kids already on the roster (which they won't).

In other words, they could sign a full class, but would have to cut players already on the team to get to 81
-or-
Sign a smaller class to get to 81

From the ESPN article: (this is referencing our proposed 11 reduction, not 16)
quote:

In a 154-page response to the NCAA, Ole Miss announced that it had self-imposed the loss of 11 total scholarships in football over a four-year period from 2015-18, including a reduction of three initial scholarships in each of its next three recruiting classes, which would allow the school to sign a maximum of 22 players in each class
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18058 posts
Posted on 6/18/16 at 1:07 pm to
Thanks. I hope that's how it works, and I also hope that we started the scholarship reductions this year. How many were we short?
Posted by Johnson City Reb
Johnson City, TN
Member since Aug 2014
519 posts
Posted on 6/19/16 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Not nearly as bad as a bowl ban or our imminent death penalty...



If we come out of this smelling like roses (ie: no bowl ban), I've got a brand new gif locked and loaded.



Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17442 posts
Posted on 6/19/16 at 2:11 pm to
I can't wait to see that and hopefully you'll be able to post it.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 6/19/16 at 2:16 pm to
Get that thang ready:twss:
This post was edited on 6/19/16 at 2:17 pm
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 6/19/16 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Are you sure about that?

He's correct
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64420 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 5:05 am to
Prepare for a hit piece from forde right before media days.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17442 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 6:13 am to
Is the Forde piece what all the Grinders talking about and if so why would Forde tip his hands to verified leg humpers?
Posted by HailFreezusOver
Oxford
Member since Sep 2014
6223 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 6:52 am to
I read this some thing like this on some msg board or twitter.. dont recall

Hope our staff is on top of this, and prepared.
These calculated media strikes and this social media age where people jump on a story without facts and baseless claims.

Freeze getting attacked on his tweets constantly with false and negative claims.
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64420 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 7:07 am to
Apparently it contains interviews with people that either didn't come to Ole miss or that left Ole miss.


Even if whatever is in the article is true...it's still shitty, sensationalized journalism. If you have the story right now, there's no reason to sit on it unless you're just being a complete dick.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter